IYLD ranks 2nd and FTHB 10th of 15 funds in the Multi-Asset Income Category.
FTHB vs IYLD
IYLD −0.16pt a year
0.66%0.50%
IYLD 3.2×the volume
5.83K18.7K
FTHB vs IYLD Performance
−0.7%−1.2%
- FTHB 0.66%
- IYLD 0.50%, better
- FTHB $14M
- IYLD $129M
- FTHB
- IYLD +6.7%
- FTHB
- IYLD 4.78%
- FTHB 22
- IYLD 19355
- FTHB 5.83K sh
- IYLD 18.7K sh, better
- FTHB $24.55
- IYLD $21.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTHB | IYLD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C54 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | A88Higher |
| Durability | D28 | A85Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Income funds
Same Category. FTHB and IYLD are both graded against the same 15 Multi-Asset Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTHBC
IYLDA
In short
FTHB Faith-based investing is mostly a stock story. FTHB brings the biblical screen to core bonds: Treasuries, investment-grade corporates and securitized debt, actively picked, with a framework built alongside Grand Canyon University.
IYLD One ticker, one income engine. IYLD is a fund of iShares funds, bundling equity, bond and other income funds into a single monthly-paying package that has run on the same playbook since 2012.
Stated mandate
FTHB The Fund seeks current income and treats long-term capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
IYLD The Fund seeks to track an index of underlying equity, fixed-income, and other income funds designed to provide high current income while offering an opportunity for capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTHB vs IYLD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTHB vs IYLD Cost
Overpaying FTHB vs IYLD
$2,917
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTHB 0.66%
$12,896
IYLD 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTHB | IYLD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $900 | $280 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $3,460 | $1,044 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $9,979 | $2,917 |
- 0.66%FTHB
- 0.50%IYLD, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Income funds
- Median 0.71%
IYLD 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
FTHB 7th cheapest of 15 funds
FTHB vs IYLD Dividends
- FTHB
- IYLD 4.78%
- FTHB
- IYLD $1.04
- FTHB $0.12
- IYLD $0.08
- FTHB Oct 30, 2026
- IYLD Oct 2, 2026
- FTHB Pays Nov 3, 2026
- IYLD Oct 7, 2026
- FTHB Monthly
- IYLD Monthly
Distribution history
FTHB vs IYLD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTHB IYLD 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTHB IYLD 0.95
- Worst fall
- FTHB IYLD −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FTHB 0.11IYLD 0.60
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.