INKM ranks 3rd and FTHB 10th of 15 funds in the Multi-Asset Income Category.
FTHB vs INKM
INKM −0.16pt a year
0.66%0.50%
INKM 2.3×the volume
5.83K13.3K
FTHB vs INKM Performance
−0.7%−0.2%
- FTHB 0.66%
- INKM 0.50%, better
- FTHB $14M
- INKM $70M
- FTHB
- INKM +7.7%
- FTHB
- INKM 4.68%
- FTHB 22
- INKM 18
- FTHB 5.83K sh
- INKM 13.3K sh, better
- FTHB $24.55
- INKM $34.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTHB | INKM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A71 | |
| Risk | C54 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | C52Higher | C47 |
| Durability | D28 | A70Higher |
Rank among Multi-Asset Income funds
Same Category. FTHB and INKM are both graded against the same 15 Multi-Asset Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTHBC
INKMA
In short
FTHB Faith-based investing is mostly a stock story. FTHB brings the biblical screen to core bonds: Treasuries, investment-grade corporates and securitized debt, actively picked, with a framework built alongside Grand Canyon University.
INKM One ticker, one active manager, and a shopping list that runs from bonds and preferreds to convertibles, global REITs and dividend stocks. INKM has been playing multi-asset income this way since 2012, at half a point of fee.
Stated mandate
FTHB The Fund seeks current income and treats long-term capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
INKM The fund seeks total return by investing primarily in income- and yield-generating assets. It is actively managed and uses tactical allocations across bonds, convertible and preferred securities, global REITs, and domestic and international dividend-focused equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTHB vs INKM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTHB vs INKM Cost
Overpaying FTHB vs INKM
$2,917
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTHB 0.66%
$12,896
INKM 0.50%
$9,979
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTHB | INKM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,180 | $900 | $280 |
| 20 | $4,504 | $3,460 | $1,044 |
| 30 | $12,896 | $9,979 | $2,917 |
- 0.66%FTHB
- 0.50%INKM, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Income funds
- Median 0.71%
INKM 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
FTHB 7th cheapest of 15 funds
FTHB vs INKM Dividends
- FTHB
- INKM 4.68%
- FTHB
- INKM $1.59
- FTHB $0.12
- INKM $0.34
- FTHB Oct 30, 2026
- INKM Sep 25, 2026
- FTHB Pays Nov 3, 2026
- INKM Sep 29, 2026
- FTHB Monthly
- INKM Quarterly
Distribution history
FTHB vs INKM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTHB INKM 7.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTHB INKM 0.92
- Worst fall
- FTHB INKM −19.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FTHB 0.11INKM 0.82
Popular comparisons
- 0.66% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.66% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.71%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.