IWMW ranks 2nd and FTKI 4th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
FTKI vs IWMW
IWMW −0.47pt a year
0.86%0.39%
IWMW 2.2×the volume
6.66K14.8K
FTKI vs IWMW Performance
+19.9%+9.7%
- FTKI 0.86%
- IWMW 0.39%, better
- FTKI $25M
- IWMW $55M
- FTKI +19.9%, better
- IWMW +9.7%
- FTKI 11.81%
- IWMW 20.14%, better
- FTKI 199
- IWMW 1970
- FTKI 6.66K sh
- IWMW 14.8K sh, better
- FTKI $19.56
- IWMW $37.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTKI | IWMW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A83Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A86 |
| Risk | A82Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | C45 | C51Higher |
| Holdings | A75 | A86Higher |
| Durability | C45 | B64Higher |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. FTKI and IWMW are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTKIB
IWMWA
In short
FTKI Most Russell 2000 income funds own the index and sell calls on it. FTKI runs an actively picked basket of roughly 300 US small caps, then writes index-level calls over the top: income first, appreciation second, paid monthly.
IWMW Small-cap income, stripped down: IWMW owns a Russell 2000 index fund and writes monthly covered calls against it, at 0.39% a year when most Russell 2000 call-writers charge more.
Stated mandate
FTKI The Fund seeks current income first and capital appreciation second. It primarily invests in small-cap equities listed on U.S. exchanges and writes exchange-traded calls on the Russell 2000 Index or small-cap equity ETFs.
IWMW The fund seeks to track an index holding the iShares Russell 2000 ETF and writes monthly covered calls to generate income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTKI vs IWMW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTKI vs IWMW Cost
Overpaying FTKI vs IWMW
$8,470
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTKI 0.86%
$16,368
IWMW 0.39%
$7,898
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTKI | IWMW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $705 | $820 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $2,725 | $3,043 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $7,898 | $8,470 |
- 0.86%FTKI
- 0.39%IWMW, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
IWMW 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
FTKI 6th cheapest of 9 funds
FTKI vs IWMW Dividends
- FTKI 11.81%
- IWMW 20.14%, better
- FTKI $2.31
- IWMW $7.52
- FTKI $0.19
- IWMW $0.59
- FTKI Oct 21, 2026
- IWMW Oct 2, 2026
- FTKI Oct 30, 2026
- IWMW Oct 7, 2026
- FTKI Monthly
- IWMW Monthly
Distribution history
FTKI vs IWMW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTKI 10.8%IWMW 12.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTKI 0.61IWMW 0.37
- Worst fall
- FTKI −15.2%IWMW −21.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FTKI 0.27IWMW 0.75
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.