IWMW ranks 2nd and RYLG 2nd of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
IWMW vs RYLG
RYLG −0.04pt a year
0.39%0.35%
IWMW 8.1×the volume
14.8K1.82K
IWMW vs RYLG Performance
+9.7%+12.7%
- IWMW 0.39%
- RYLG 0.35%, better
- IWMW $55M
- RYLG $7M
- IWMW +9.7%
- RYLG +12.7%, better
- IWMW 20.14%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- IWMW 1970
- RYLG 2
- IWMW 14.8K sh, better
- RYLG 1.82K sh
- IWMW $37.45
- RYLG $23.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IWMW | RYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A99Higher |
| Risk | D39 | C46Higher |
| Tradability | C51Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A86Higher | C45 |
| Durability | B64Higher | C45 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. IWMW and RYLG are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IWMWA
RYLGA
In short
IWMW Small-cap income, stripped down: IWMW owns a Russell 2000 index fund and writes monthly covered calls against it, at 0.39% a year when most Russell 2000 call-writers charge more.
RYLG Most small-cap income funds sell calls on the whole book. RYLG writes one-month at-the-money calls on about half of it, leaving the rest uncapped, and it charges the lowest fee in its Russell 2000 options-income group.
Stated mandate
IWMW The fund seeks to track an index holding the iShares Russell 2000 ETF and writes monthly covered calls to generate income.
RYLG The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It obtains Russell 2000 equity exposure and sells one-month at-the-money calls covering approximately half of the portfolio value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IWMW vs RYLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IWMW vs RYLG Cost
Overpaying IWMW vs RYLG
$772
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IWMW 0.39%
$7,898
RYLG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IWMW | RYLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $634 | $71 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $2,454 | $271 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $7,126 | $772 |
- 0.39%IWMW
- 0.35%RYLG, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLG cheapest of 9 funds
IWMW 2nd cheapest of 9 funds
IWMW vs RYLG Dividends
- IWMW 20.14%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- IWMW $7.52
- RYLG $2.42
- IWMW $0.59
- RYLG $0.11
- IWMW Oct 2, 2026
- RYLG Oct 19, 2026
- IWMW Oct 7, 2026
- RYLG Oct 22, 2026
- IWMW Monthly
- RYLG Monthly
Distribution history
IWMW vs RYLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IWMW 12.4%RYLG 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IWMW 0.37RYLG 0.83
- Worst fall
- IWMW −21.9%RYLG −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IWMW 0.75RYLG 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.86%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.