RYLG ranks 2nd and FTKI 4th of 9 funds in the Russell 2000 Option Income Category.
FTKI vs RYLG
RYLG −0.51pt a year
0.86%0.35%
FTKI 3.7×the volume
6.66K1.82K
FTKI vs RYLG Performance
+19.9%+12.7%
- FTKI 0.86%
- RYLG 0.35%, better
- FTKI $25M
- RYLG $7M
- FTKI +19.9%, better
- RYLG +12.7%
- FTKI 11.81%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- FTKI 199
- RYLG 2
- FTKI 6.66K sh, better
- RYLG 1.82K sh
- FTKI $19.56
- RYLG $23.34
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTKI | RYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A93Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A99 |
| Risk | A82Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | C45Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | C45 |
| Durability | C45 | C45 |
Rank among Russell 2000 Option Income funds
Same Category. FTKI and RYLG are both graded against the same 9 Russell 2000 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTKIB
RYLGA
In short
FTKI Most Russell 2000 income funds own the index and sell calls on it. FTKI runs an actively picked basket of roughly 300 US small caps, then writes index-level calls over the top: income first, appreciation second, paid monthly.
RYLG Most small-cap income funds sell calls on the whole book. RYLG writes one-month at-the-money calls on about half of it, leaving the rest uncapped, and it charges the lowest fee in its Russell 2000 options-income group.
Stated mandate
FTKI The Fund seeks current income first and capital appreciation second. It primarily invests in small-cap equities listed on U.S. exchanges and writes exchange-traded calls on the Russell 2000 Index or small-cap equity ETFs.
RYLG The Fund seeks results generally corresponding to the Cboe Russell 2000 Half BuyWrite Index. It obtains Russell 2000 equity exposure and sells one-month at-the-money calls covering approximately half of the portfolio value.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTKI vs RYLG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTKI vs RYLG Cost
Overpaying FTKI vs RYLG
$9,242
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTKI 0.86%
$16,368
RYLG 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTKI | RYLG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,525 | $634 | $891 |
| 20 | $5,768 | $2,454 | $3,314 |
| 30 | $16,368 | $7,126 | $9,242 |
- 0.86%FTKI
- 0.35%RYLG, cheaper
- Middle half of Russell 2000 Option Income funds
- Median 0.69%
RYLG cheapest of 9 funds
FTKI 6th cheapest of 9 funds
FTKI vs RYLG Dividends
- FTKI 11.81%, better
- RYLG 10.40%
- FTKI $2.31
- RYLG $2.42
- FTKI $0.19
- RYLG $0.11
- FTKI Oct 21, 2026
- RYLG Oct 19, 2026
- FTKI Oct 30, 2026
- RYLG Oct 22, 2026
- FTKI Monthly
- RYLG Monthly
Distribution history
FTKI vs RYLG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTKI 10.8%RYLG 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTKI 0.61RYLG 0.83
- Worst fall
- FTKI −15.2%RYLG −22.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FTKI 0.27RYLG 0.96
Popular comparisons
- 0.86% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.68%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.