QAI ranks 3rd and FTLS 10th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
FTLS vs QAI
QAI −0.57pt a year
1.38%0.81%
FTLS 2.5×the volume
143K58.2K
FTLS +5.6pt
+9.4%+3.8%
FTLS vs QAI Performance
+53.7%+21.8%
- FTLS 1.38%
- QAI 0.81%, better
- FTLS $2.58B
- QAI $985M
- FTLS +6.8%
- QAI +7.5%, better
- FTLS 0.89%
- QAI 1.41%, better
- FTLS 269
- QAI 66
- FTLS 143K sh, better
- QAI 58.2K sh
- FTLS $74.10
- QAI $35.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTLS | QAI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A86Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | A81 |
| Holdings | B63Higher | C45 |
| Durability | A94Higher | A84 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. FTLS and QAI are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTLSB
QAIA
In short
FTLS Hedge-fund mechanics in an ETF wrapper: a long book of US stocks paired with a short book, and short proceeds never recycled into more longs. Live since 2014, it's one of the originals on the long/short shelf.
QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).
Stated mandate
FTLS The Fund seeks its objective through long and short positions in equity securities, with portfolio exposure managed across long and short positions.
QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTLS vs QAI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTLS vs QAI Cost
Overpaying FTLS vs QAI
$9,036
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTLS 1.38%
$24,554
QAI 0.81%
$15,518
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTLS | QAI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,395 | $1,439 | $956 |
| 20 | $8,848 | $5,456 | $3,392 |
| 30 | $24,554 | $15,518 | $9,036 |
- 1.38%FTLS
- 0.81%QAI, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds
FTLS 20th cheapest of 29 funds
FTLS vs QAI Dividends
- FTLS 0.89%
- QAI 1.41%, better
- FTLS $0.67
- QAI $0.50
- FTLS $0.18
- QAI $0.50
- FTLS Sep 24, 2026
- QAI Dec 30, 2025
- FTLS Sep 30, 2026
- QAI Jan 5, 2026
- FTLS Quarterly
- QAI Annual
Distribution history
FTLS vs QAI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTLS
- QAI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTLS 7.1%QAI 5.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTLS 1.33, betterQAI 0.81
- Worst fall
- FTLS −11.7%, betterQAI −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FTLS 0.47QAI 0.36
FTLS and QAI in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 1.38% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.81% · 0.80%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.