Skip to content

FTLS vs QALT

First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF

FTLSBNYSE Arca

SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

QALTANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QALT −0.58pt a year

FTLS1.38%QALT0.80%

Avg volume · 30D

FTLS 8.1×the volume

FTLS143KQALT17.7K

FTLS vs QALT Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+6.8%FTLS+6.9%QALT

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. FTLS +6.8%. QALT +6.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%10%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
FTLS 1.38%
QALT 0.80%, better
Fund size
FTLS $2.58B
QALT $194M
1Y total return
FTLS +6.8%
QALT +6.9%, better
Yield (12M)
FTLS 0.89%
QALT No data
Holdings
FTLS 269
QALT 27
Avg volume (30D)
FTLS 143K sh, better
QALT 17.7K sh
NAV per share
FTLS $74.10
QALT $25.77
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FTLS: Cost 34, Risk 61, Mission not scored, Tradability 82, Holdings 63, Durability 94. QALT: Cost 90, Risk 70, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for FTLS, QALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFTLSQALT
Cost30% weightD34A90Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB61A70Higher
Tradability15% weightA82HigherB59
Holdings10% weightB63Not scored
Durability5% weightA94HigherB64

Rank among Alternative Strategies funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FTLS and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Alternative Strategies⁠

Category · 29 funds
See all 29 ›

QALT ranks 4th and FTLS 10th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 1AHBDCHilton BDC Corporate Bond ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 3AQAINYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AQALTSEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETFScore 75
  5. Rank 5BRNMNRiverNorth Market Neutral ETFScore 68
  6. Rank 9BLALTFirst Trust Multi-Strategy Alternative ETFScore 58
  7. Rank 10BFTLSFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETFScore 57
  8. Rank 11BCLSEConvergence Long/Short Equity ETFScore 55

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FTLSBFirst Trust Long/Short Equity ETF

QALTASEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

In short

FTLS Hedge-fund mechanics in an ETF wrapper: a long book of US stocks paired with a short book, and short proceeds never recycled into more longs. Live since 2014, it's one of the originals on the long/short shelf.

QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.

Stated mandate

FTLS The Fund seeks its objective through long and short positions in equity securities, with portfolio exposure managed across long and short positions.

QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.

Why people hold it

  • FTLS The short sleeve is a dial, not a fixture. Under normal conditions the portfolio runs 80-100% long and 0-50% short, and the manager can shrink the shorts or switch them off.mutualfunds.com
  • No leverage baked in: short proceeds aren't used to buy more longs, so net long exposure stays at or below 100%, which can leave a sizable cash position.mutualfunds.com
  • Trading since 2014 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it's one of the older long/short ETFs on the market, with steady if unspectacular daily volume.
  • Roughly 500 positions spread across the long and short books, so no single name drives the outcome. At least 80% of assets sit in US-listed equities or equity ETFs.usnews.com
  • QALT Charges 0.80% a year against a 1.07% median for alternatives funds. Multi-manager hedge fund exposure usually bills more than that.
  • Not a one-trick fund. Directional or tactical, event-driven and arbitrage sleeves run side by side through several underlying funds and sub-advisers.
  • The yardstick is 3-month T-bills, the cash hurdle hedge funds get judged on. The stated aim is positive absolute return with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds.
  • Screens near the top of its alternatives peer group, and comes in under pricier multi-strategy options such as HFGM and HDG at 0.95%.

Worth knowing

  • FTLS Cost is the trade-off: 1.38% a year, well above the typical actively managed US equity ETF. Shorting carries stock-borrow and dividend expenses that long-only funds don't.
  • Against the full active US equity field it lands in the lower half, largely on price: core rivals like DFAU (0.12%) and DFAC (0.17%) run long-only for a sliver of the fee.
  • The short book cuts both ways by design: it gains when shorted names fall and loses when they rise, so results can diverge sharply from a plain long-only equity fund.mutualfunds.com
  • QALT Launched in 2025, so there is no long record showing how this manager lineup behaves through a full market cycle.
  • Trading is thin next to big index ETFs, which can mean wider spreads when you get in or out.
  • Not the cheapest seat in the aisle: RNMN (0.59%) and CCEF (0.74%) charge less, though each runs a narrower strategy set than a multi-manager book.

Full FTLS profile⁠

Full QALT profile⁠

FTLS vs QALT Holdings

How FTLS and QALT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Level by level

  • Asset classStocks, Alternatives0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile74.2%
  • Sector11 Sectors85.5%

Sector

Sector weights in FTLS and QALT, widest gap first
SectorMore in FTLSMore in QALTGap
IndustrialsQALT +7.5 points
TechnologyFTLS +7.3 points
CommunicationFTLS +3.6 points
FinancialsQALT +2.3 points
UtilitiesQALT +1.8 points
EnergyFTLS +1.7 points
Consumer StaplesFTLS +1.6 points
MaterialsQALT +1.0 points
Health CareQALT +1.0 points
Real EstateQALT +1.0 points
Consumer DiscretionaryFTLS +0.3 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in FTLS and QALT, widest gap first
CountryMore in FTLSMore in QALTGap
United StatesFTLS +22.9 points
TaiwanQALT +4.2 points
South KoreaQALT +3.8 points
ChinaQALT +3.3 points
CanadaFTLS +2.9 points
JapanQALT +2.5 points
IndiaQALT +1.9 points
United KingdomQALT +1.6 points
Other countries (31)QALT +8.4 points

Outside the US: QALT 39% developed, 61% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • FTLS65.3%
  • QALT82.3%

Securities held

  • FTLS268
  • QALT26

Asset class

FTLS
Stocks
QALT
Alternatives

Holdings

  • Only in FTLS268
  • In both0
  • Only in QALT26

Only in FTLS

268 securities, 100% of FTLS by weight

  • Apple Inc.6.75%
  • NVIDIA Corporation6.31%
  • Microsoft Corporation5.02%

Only in QALT

26 securities, 29.9% of QALT by weight

  • Coca-Cola Co 0CP 11/20/261.46%
  • Sanofi 0 % Cp 12/14/20261.45%
  • Roche Holdings 0 11/12/261.45%

Weight gaps

FTLS and QALT share no securities.

All 515 FTLS holdings⁠All 42 QALT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FTLS vs QALT Cost

Overpaying FTLS vs QALT

$9,208

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FTLS 1.38%

    $24,554

  • QALT 0.80%

    $15,346

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FTLS 1.38%
  • QALT 0.80%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530FTLS $24,554QALT $15,346

Year by year

YearFTLSQALTOverpaying
10$2,395$1,422$973
20$8,848$5,393$3,455
30$24,554$15,346$9,208

Expense ratio

  • 1.38%FTLS
  • 0.80%QALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
  • Median 1.13%

QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds

FTLS 20th cheapest of 29 funds

FTLS vs QALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
FTLS 0.89%
QALT No data
Payout (12M)
FTLS $0.67
QALT No data
Last payment
FTLS $0.18
QALT $0.17
Ex-dividend
FTLS Sep 24, 2026
QALT Oct 5, 2026
Paid on
FTLS Sep 30, 2026
QALT Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
FTLS Quarterly
QALT Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FTLSQuarterly · 33 paymentsAll FTLS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 33 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 23, 2017 $0.03; Jun 22, 2017 $0.06; Sep 21, 2017 $0.05; Dec 21, 2017 $0.03; Mar 22, 2018 $0.06; Jun 21, 2018 $0.08; Sep 14, 2018 $0.07; Dec 18, 2018 $0.12; Mar 21, 2019 $0.07; Jun 14, 2019 $0.11; Sep 25, 2019 $0.13; Dec 13, 2019 $0.05; Mar 26, 2020 $0.04; Sep 24, 2020 $0.02; Dec 24, 2020 $0.13; Dec 23, 2021 $0.0033; Sep 23, 2022 $0.07; Dec 23, 2022 $0.33; Mar 24, 2023 $0.13; Jun 27, 2023 $0.20; Sep 22, 2023 $0.21; Dec 22, 2023 $0.30; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 27, 2024 $0.31; Sep 26, 2024 $0.26; Dec 13, 2024 $0.29; Mar 27, 2025 $0.15; Jun 26, 2025 $0.22; Sep 25, 2025 $0.18; Dec 12, 2025 $0.21; Mar 26, 2026 $0.06; Jun 25, 2026 $0.21; Sep 24, 2026 $0.18. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
QALTQuarterly · 5 paymentsAll QALT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 17, 2025 $0.62; Dec 29, 2025 $0.66; Apr 6, 2026 $0.15; Jul 6, 2026 $0.15; Oct 5, 2026 $0.17. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

FTLS vs QALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FTLS 7.1%QALT 7.2%since Sep 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FTLS 1.33QALT 0.77since Sep 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FTLS −11.7%QALT −4.9%since Aug 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FTLS 0.47QALT 0.24

FTLS and QALT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FTLSBvsFLSPA

    First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QALTAvsFLSPA

    SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTLSBvsHBDCA

    First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QALTAvsHBDCA

    SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FTLSBvsQAIA

    First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF · NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.38% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QALTAvsQAIA

    SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF · NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.80% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.