QALT ranks 4th and FTLS 10th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.
FTLS vs QALT
0.0%by weight
QALT −0.58pt a year
1.38%0.80%
FTLS 8.1×the volume
143K17.7K
FTLS vs QALT Performance
+6.8%+6.9%
- FTLS 1.38%
- QALT 0.80%, better
- FTLS $2.58B
- QALT $194M
- FTLS +6.8%
- QALT +6.9%, better
- FTLS 0.89%
- QALT
- FTLS 269
- QALT 27
- FTLS 143K sh, better
- QALT 17.7K sh
- FTLS $74.10
- QALT $25.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTLS | QALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D34 | A90Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B61 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | A94Higher | B64 |
Rank among Alternative Strategies funds
Same Category. FTLS and QALT are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTLSB
QALTA
In short
FTLS Hedge-fund mechanics in an ETF wrapper: a long book of US stocks paired with a short book, and short proceeds never recycled into more longs. Live since 2014, it's one of the originals on the long/short shelf.
QALT One ticker, several hedge fund playbooks: SEI stacks sub-advisers running directional, event-driven and arbitrage strategies, and measures itself against 3-month T-bills instead of the S&P 500. It undercuts the typical alternatives fund on fees.
Stated mandate
FTLS The Fund seeks its objective through long and short positions in equity securities, with portfolio exposure managed across long and short positions.
QALT The fund seeks positive absolute returns across market cycles with reduced correlation to stocks and bonds. It pursues this through multiple underlying funds and sub-advisers using directional or tactical, event-driven, and arbitrage approaches.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTLS vs QALT Holdings
How FTLS and QALT differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
- Country74.2%
- Sector85.5%
Sector
| Sector | More in FTLSMore in QALT | Gap | FTLS | QALT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industrials | QALT +7.5 points | 8.4% | 15.9% | |
| Technology | FTLS +7.3 points | 34.7% | 27.4% | |
| Communication | FTLS +3.6 points | 7.8% | 4.2% | |
| Financials | QALT +2.3 points | 11.3% | 13.6% | |
| Utilities | QALT +1.8 points | 0.3% | 2.1% | |
| Energy | FTLS +1.7 points | 5.6% | 3.9% | |
| Consumer Staples | FTLS +1.6 points | 4.6% | 3.0% | |
| Materials | QALT +1.0 points | 3.4% | 4.4% | |
| Health Care | QALT +1.0 points | 12.4% | 13.3% | |
| Real Estate | QALT +1.0 points | 3.2% | 4.2% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | FTLS +0.3 points | 8.3% | 8.0% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FTLSMore in QALT | Gap | FTLS | QALT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | FTLS +22.9 points | 94.6% | 71.7% | |
| Taiwan | QALT +4.2 points | 0.9% | 5.1% | |
| South Korea | QALT +3.8 points | 0.0% | 3.8% | |
| China | QALT +3.3 points | 0.1% | 3.4% | |
| Canada | FTLS +2.9 points | 3.1% | 0.2% | |
| Japan | QALT +2.5 points | 0.0% | 2.5% | |
| India | QALT +1.9 points | 0.0% | 1.9% | |
| United Kingdom | QALT +1.6 points | 0.5% | 2.1% | |
| Other countries (31) | QALT +8.4 points | 0.8% | 9.2% |
Outside the US: QALT 39% developed, 61% emerging.
Concentration
- FTLS65.3%
- QALT82.3%
- FTLS268
- QALT26
Asset class
- FTLS
- Stocks
- QALT
- Alternatives
Holdings
- Only in FTLS268
- In both0
- Only in QALT26
Only in FTLS
268 securities, 100% of FTLS by weight
- Apple Inc.6.75%
- NVIDIA Corporation6.31%
- Microsoft Corporation5.02%
- Alphabet Inc. (Class A)4.08%
- Amazon.com, Inc.3.17%
- Analog Devices, Inc.1.55%
- Visa Inc. (Class A)1.55%
- Mastercard Incorporated1.38%
- Seagate Technology Holdings Plc1.32%
- Texas Instruments Incorporated1.27%
- Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)1.16%
- Gilead Sciences, Inc.1.06%
- Broadcom Inc.1.06%
- Verizon Communications Inc.1.04%
- Salesforce, Inc.1.03%
- AbbVie Inc.0.99%
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (ADR)0.97%
- McKesson Corporation0.97%
- Eli Lilly and Company0.91%
- Shopify Inc. (Class A)0.89%
- Chevron Corporation0.87%
- Caterpillar Inc.0.86%
- Citigroup Inc.0.84%
- CME Group Inc.0.82%
- Cisco Systems, Inc.0.80%
- Merck & Co., Inc.0.78%
- Tesla, Inc.0.77%
- The Coca-Cola Company0.75%
- Snowflake Inc. (Class A)0.75%
- Valero Energy Corporation0.73%
- Bank of America Corporation0.69%
- Ross Stores, Inc.0.67%
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company0.64%
- Dell Technologies Inc. (Class C)0.63%
- Chubb Limited0.62%
- Pfizer Inc.0.62%
- Micron Technology, Inc.0.60%
- AT&T Inc.0.59%
- General Motors Company0.58%
- Intuitive Surgical, Inc.0.57%
- T-Mobile US, Inc.0.57%
- Autodesk, Inc.0.57%
- Howmet Aerospace Inc.0.55%
- Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF0.55%
- Fortinet, Inc.0.55%
- Cardinal Health, Inc.0.54%
- Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF0.54%
- iShares Core S&P SmallCap ETF0.54%
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company0.53%
- Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF0.53%
Only in QALT
26 securities, 29.9% of QALT by weight
- Coca-Cola Co 0CP 11/20/261.46%
- Sanofi 0 % Cp 12/14/20261.45%
- Roche Holdings 0 11/12/261.45%
- Toyotamotor 0CP 01/21/271.36%
- Fhlbdn 01/05/271.34%
- Fhlbdn 12/04/261.33%
- Ciscosystems 0CP 12/16/261.29%
- Caterpillar 0 Cp 11/10/261.29%
- Walmartinc 0CP 12/21/261.28%
- Fhlbdn 12/28/261.25%
- NESTLEFINANCE0CP 11/19/261.24%
- PROCTER&GAMBL0CP 10/13/261.21%
- Unilever Capital Corp1.18%
- Fhlbdn 12/22/261.17%
- Fhlbdn 01/19/271.16%
- John Deere 0CP 12/18/20261.14%
- Svenska Handelsbanken 0CP1.13%
- Apple Inc1.13%
- Fhlbdn 11/13/261.10%
- Archer DANIELS0CP 12/9/261.09%
- TORONTODOMINIO0CP 12/7/261.05%
- Fhlbdn 01/14/271.04%
- Fhlbdn 11/18/261.03%
- Fhlbdn 12/07/260.93%
- JOHNSON&JOHNS Cp 11/16/260.78%
- B 01/05/270.05%
Weight gaps
FTLS and QALT share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTLS vs QALT Cost
Overpaying FTLS vs QALT
$9,208
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTLS 1.38%
$24,554
QALT 0.80%
$15,346
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTLS | QALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,395 | $1,422 | $973 |
| 20 | $8,848 | $5,393 | $3,455 |
| 30 | $24,554 | $15,346 | $9,208 |
- 1.38%FTLS
- 0.80%QALT, cheaper
- Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
- Median 1.13%
QALT 4th cheapest of 29 funds
FTLS 20th cheapest of 29 funds
FTLS vs QALT Dividends
- FTLS 0.89%
- QALT
- FTLS $0.67
- QALT
- FTLS $0.18
- QALT $0.17
- FTLS Sep 24, 2026
- QALT Oct 5, 2026
- FTLS Sep 30, 2026
- QALT Oct 6, 2026
- FTLS Quarterly
- QALT Quarterly
Distribution history
FTLS vs QALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTLS 7.1%QALT 7.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTLS 1.33QALT 0.77
- Worst fall
- FTLS −11.7%QALT −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FTLS 0.47QALT 0.24
FTLS and QALT in the news
Category Review
The largest alternatives fund has no one-year record

Popular comparisons
- 1.38% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.39%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.38% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.80% · 0.81%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.