VTES ranks 1st and FTMS 15th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
FTMS vs VTES
VTES −0.16pt a year
0.21%0.05%
VTES 2.0×the volume
246K498K
FTMS vs VTES Performance
+2.3%+1.6%
- FTMS 0.21%
- VTES 0.05%, better
- FTMS $263M
- VTES $3.6B
- FTMS +2.3%, better
- VTES +1.6%
- FTMS
- VTES 2.67%
- FTMS 288
- VTES 3913
- FTMS 246K sh
- VTES 498K sh, better
- FTMS $9.85
- VTES $100.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTMS | VTES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C52 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C48Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | C41 | A75Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | B63Higher |
| Durability | B67 | A83Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. FTMS and VTES are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTMSB
VTESA
In short
FTMS The ETF rebuild of a short-muni strategy that has been running since 2013, managers intact. Active bond picking in an aisle where most rivals track an index: investment grade, three years or less, monthly income exempt from federal tax.
VTES Vanguard's muni ETF on a short leash: an AMT-free tax-exempt index, but capped at seven years to trim interest-rate sensitivity. Five basis points, roughly 2,700 bonds, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
FTMS The fund seeks a high level of current income exempt from federal income tax, consistent with preserving capital.
VTES The Fund seeks to track an index representing investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds with remaining maturities from one month through seven years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTMS vs VTES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTMS vs VTES Cost
Overpaying FTMS vs VTES
$3,297
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTMS 0.21%
$4,357
VTES 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTMS | VTES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $383 | $92 | $291 |
| 20 | $1,491 | $360 | $1,131 |
| 30 | $4,357 | $1,060 | $3,297 |
- 0.21%FTMS
- 0.05%VTES, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
VTES cheapest of 27 funds
FTMS 14th cheapest of 27 funds
FTMS vs VTES Dividends
- FTMS
- VTES 2.67%
- FTMS
- VTES $2.69
- FTMS $0.03
- VTES $0.19
- FTMS Oct 1, 2026
- VTES Oct 1, 2026
- FTMS Oct 6, 2026
- VTES Oct 5, 2026
- FTMS Monthly
- VTES Monthly
Distribution history
FTMS vs VTES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTMS 2.8%VTES 2.8%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- FTMS −0.50VTES −0.33
- Worst fall
- FTMS −2.0%VTES −3.0%
- Market sensitivity
- FTMS 0.07VTES 0.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.21% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.