MUB ranks 3rd and FTNJ 29th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FTNJ vs MUB
MUB −0.30pt a year
0.35%0.05%
MUB 54.1×the volume
178K9.65M
FTNJ vs MUB Performance
+1.2%+0.7%
- FTNJ 0.35%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- FTNJ $201M
- MUB $55B
- FTNJ
- MUB +1.1%
- FTNJ
- MUB 3.26%
- FTNJ 186
- MUB 7990
- FTNJ 178K sh
- MUB 9.65M sh, better
- FTNJ $8.57
- MUB $104.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTNJ | MUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A72Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | C54 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A82Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A93Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FTNJ and MUB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTNJB
MUBA
In short
FTNJ A New Jersey-only muni portfolio in an ETF wrapper: the mandate is current income exempt from both federal and New Jersey personal income tax, run off a Franklin strategy whose lineage goes back to 1990. Narrow by design, in a cohort ruled by national funds.
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
Stated mandate
FTNJ The fund seeks a high level of current income exempt from federal income tax and New Jersey personal income tax.
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTNJ vs MUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTNJ vs MUB Cost
Overpaying FTNJ vs MUB
$6,066
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTNJ 0.35%
$7,126
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTNJ | MUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $92 | $542 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $360 | $2,094 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,060 | $6,066 |
- 0.35%FTNJ
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
FTNJ 37th cheapest of 63 funds
FTNJ vs MUB Dividends
- FTNJ
- MUB 3.26%
- FTNJ
- MUB $3.42
- FTNJ $0.03
- MUB $0.28
- FTNJ Nov 2, 2026
- MUB Nov 2, 2026
- FTNJ Nov 5, 2026
- MUB Nov 5, 2026
- FTNJ Monthly
- MUB Monthly
Distribution history
FTNJ vs MUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTNJ MUB 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTNJ MUB −0.03
- Worst fall
- FTNJ MUB −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FTNJ 0.96MUB 0.90
FTNJ and MUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





