VCRM ranks 2nd and FTNJ 29th of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FTNJ vs VCRM
VCRM −0.23pt a year
0.35%0.12%
VCRM 4.1×the volume
178K730K
FTNJ vs VCRM Performance
+1.2%+1.9%
- FTNJ 0.35%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- FTNJ $201M
- VCRM $2.2B
- FTNJ
- VCRM +2.3%
- FTNJ
- VCRM 3.75%
- FTNJ 186
- VCRM 2595
- FTNJ 178K sh
- VCRM 730K sh, better
- FTNJ $8.57
- VCRM $74.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTNJ | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A72 | A72 |
| Tradability | C54 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | D38 | A81Higher |
| Durability | B65 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FTNJ and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTNJB
VCRMA
In short
FTNJ A New Jersey-only muni portfolio in an ETF wrapper: the mandate is current income exempt from both federal and New Jersey personal income tax, run off a Franklin strategy whose lineage goes back to 1990. Narrow by design, in a cohort ruled by national funds.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
FTNJ The fund seeks a high level of current income exempt from federal income tax and New Jersey personal income tax.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTNJ vs VCRM Holdings
How FTNJ and VCRM differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country97.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in FTNJMore in VCRM | Gap | FTNJ | VCRM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal | FTNJ +0.3 points | 100.0% | 99.7% | |
| Securitized | VCRM +0.3 points | 0.0% | 0.3% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in FTNJMore in VCRM | Gap | FTNJ | VCRM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | VCRM +2.9 points | 96.9% | 99.8% | |
| Puerto Rico | FTNJ +2.9 points | 3.1% | 0.2% |
Concentration
- FTNJ22.5%
- VCRM8.8%
- FTNJ184
- VCRM2,433
Asset class
- FTNJ
- Bonds
- VCRM
- Bonds
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. FTNJ holds 184 securities, VCRM 2,433.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTNJ vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying FTNJ vs VCRM
$4,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTNJ 0.35%
$7,126
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTNJ | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $220 | $414 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $859 | $1,595 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $2,520 | $4,606 |
- 0.35%FTNJ
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
FTNJ 37th cheapest of 63 funds
FTNJ vs VCRM Dividends
- FTNJ
- VCRM 3.75%
- FTNJ
- VCRM $2.80
- FTNJ $0.03
- VCRM $0.21
- FTNJ Nov 2, 2026
- VCRM Nov 2, 2026
- FTNJ Nov 5, 2026
- VCRM Nov 4, 2026
- FTNJ Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
FTNJ vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTNJ VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTNJ VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- FTNJ VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FTNJ 0.96VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.