MUB ranks 2nd and FTPA 41st of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FTPA vs MUB
MUB −0.30pt a year
0.35%0.05%
MUB 93.7×the volume
99.1K9.29M
FTPA vs MUB Performance
−0.5%−0.4%
- FTPA 0.35%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- FTPA $127M
- MUB $54.4B
- FTPA
- MUB +0.1%
- FTPA
- MUB 3.28%
- FTPA 135
- MUB 7950
- FTPA 99.1K sh
- MUB 9.29M sh, better
- FTPA $8.35
- MUB $103.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTPA | MUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C45 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A82Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A93Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FTPA and MUB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTPAC
MUBA
In short
FTPA A Pennsylvania muni portfolio with 1989 roots: run for decades as a Putnam mutual fund, rewrapped as an ETF in 2025. Actively managed, aiming at income exempt from federal and Pennsylvania income tax.
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
Stated mandate
FTPA The filing identifies Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF as a fund with its own investment objective, policies, and principal investment strategies.
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTPA vs MUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTPA vs MUB Cost
Overpaying FTPA vs MUB
$6,066
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTPA 0.35%
$7,126
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTPA | MUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $92 | $542 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $360 | $2,094 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $1,060 | $6,066 |
- 0.35%FTPA
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
FTPA 37th cheapest of 63 funds
FTPA vs MUB Dividends
- FTPA
- MUB 3.28%
- FTPA
- MUB $3.42
- FTPA $0.03
- MUB $0.28
- FTPA Oct 1, 2026
- MUB Oct 1, 2026
- FTPA Oct 6, 2026
- MUB Oct 6, 2026
- FTPA Monthly
- MUB Monthly
Distribution history
FTPA vs MUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTPA MUB 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTPA MUB −0.03
- Worst fall
- FTPA −18.5%MUB −11.6%
- Market sensitivity
- FTPA 0.16MUB 0.90
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





