VCRM ranks 4th and FTPA 41st of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
FTPA vs VCRM
VCRM −0.23pt a year
0.35%0.12%
VCRM 6.8×the volume
99.1K679K
FTPA vs VCRM Performance
−0.5%+0.7%
- FTPA 0.35%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- FTPA $127M
- VCRM $2.2B
- FTPA
- VCRM +1.1%
- FTPA
- VCRM 3.81%
- FTPA 135
- VCRM 2588
- FTPA 99.1K sh
- VCRM 679K sh, better
- FTPA $8.35
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTPA | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C45 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C47 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | C45 | A81Higher |
| Durability | C53 | A74Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. FTPA and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTPAC
VCRMA
In short
FTPA A Pennsylvania muni portfolio with 1989 roots: run for decades as a Putnam mutual fund, rewrapped as an ETF in 2025. Actively managed, aiming at income exempt from federal and Pennsylvania income tax.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
FTPA The filing identifies Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF as a fund with its own investment objective, policies, and principal investment strategies.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTPA vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTPA vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying FTPA vs VCRM
$4,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTPA 0.35%
$7,126
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTPA | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $634 | $220 | $414 |
| 20 | $2,454 | $859 | $1,595 |
| 30 | $7,126 | $2,520 | $4,606 |
- 0.35%FTPA
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
FTPA 37th cheapest of 63 funds
FTPA vs VCRM Dividends
- FTPA
- VCRM 3.81%
- FTPA
- VCRM $2.82
- FTPA $0.03
- VCRM $0.21
- FTPA Oct 1, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- FTPA Oct 6, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- FTPA Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
FTPA vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTPA VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTPA VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- FTPA −18.5%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- FTPA 0.16VCRM 0.17
Popular comparisons
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.