GNR ranks 1st and FTRI 12th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
FTRI vs GNR
GNR −0.30pt a year
0.70%0.40%
GNR 11.1×the volume
30.7K340K
GNR +0.4pt
+9.9%+10.3%
FTRI vs GNR Performance
+63.5%+64.9%
- FTRI 0.70%
- GNR 0.40%, better
- FTRI $114M
- GNR $5.36B
- FTRI +15.0%
- GNR +29.6%, better
- FTRI 2.13%
- GNR 2.47%, better
- FTRI 56
- GNR 112
- FTRI 30.7K sh
- GNR 340K sh, better
- FTRI $16.80
- GNR $74.86
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTRI | GNR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F16 | A80Higher |
| Mission | A75 | |
| Risk | D36 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | D38 | A83Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | A79Higher |
| Durability | B63 | A89Higher |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. FTRI and GNR are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTRID
GNRA
In short
FTRI Plenty of natural resources funds just own the biggest miners and drillers. FTRI's index is built around income from resource companies worldwide, roughly 60 of them, and it distributes quarterly. Trading since 2010.
GNR Most resource ETFs are energy funds in a hard hat. GNR spreads a global, large-cap lineup across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining, roughly 90 names tracking an S&P natural resources index since 2010.
Stated mandate
FTRI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index.
GNR The fund seeks to provide investment results corresponding generally to the total return performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It provides exposure to large-cap companies across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTRI vs GNR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTRI vs GNR Cost
Overpaying FTRI vs GNR
$5,516
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTRI 0.70%
$13,606
GNR 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTRI | GNR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $723 | $527 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $2,793 | $1,967 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $8,090 | $5,516 |
- 0.70%FTRI
- 0.40%GNR, cheaper
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
GNR 4th cheapest of 14 funds
FTRI 12th cheapest of 14 funds
FTRI vs GNR Dividends
- FTRI 2.13%
- GNR 2.47%, better
- FTRI $0.35
- GNR $1.82
- FTRI $0.08
- GNR $0.86
- FTRI Sep 24, 2026
- GNR Jun 1, 2026
- FTRI Sep 30, 2026
- GNR Jun 3, 2026
- FTRI Quarterly
- GNR Twice a year
Distribution history
FTRI vs GNR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTRI
- GNR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTRI 17.3%GNR 15.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FTRI 0.62GNR 0.75, better
- Worst fall
- FTRI −27.5%GNR −25.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FTRI 0.51GNR 0.49
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.