SCHO ranks 1st and FTSD 12th of 15 funds in the Treasuries (1-3 Year) Category.
FTSD vs SCHO
SCHO −0.22pt a year
0.25%0.03%
SCHO 125.1×the volume
36.4K4.55M
FTSD +0.3pt
+2.1%+1.8%
FTSD vs SCHO Performance
+14.3%+10.8%
- FTSD 0.25%
- SCHO 0.03%, better
- FTSD $349M
- SCHO $15.7B
- FTSD +2.7%, better
- SCHO +2.1%
- FTSD 4.78%, better
- SCHO 4.18%
- FTSD 335
- SCHO 97
- FTSD 36.4K sh
- SCHO 4.55M sh, better
- FTSD $89.49
- SCHO $24.01
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTSD | SCHO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C51 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | C46 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | B69Higher |
| Durability | B57 | A77Higher |
Rank among Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
Same Category. FTSD and SCHO are both graded against the same 15 Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTSDC
SCHOA
In short
FTSD Most short-government ETFs just clone a 1-3 year Treasury index. FTSD's mandate is wider: at least 80% in U.S. government, agency or instrumentality debt, run for current income and capital preservation since 2013.
SCHO Short Treasuries, stripped to the studs: roughly 100 US government bonds maturing in one to three years, wrapped in a 0.03% fee. Running since 2010, and one of the tighter builds in its corner of the bond market.
Stated mandate
FTSD The Fund seeks high current income consistent with prudent investing and capital preservation, investing at least 80% of net assets in U.S. government, agency, or instrumentality securities.
SCHO The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of an index representing the short-term U.S. Treasury bond market.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTSD vs SCHO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTSD vs SCHO Cost
Overpaying FTSD vs SCHO
$4,521
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTSD 0.25%
$5,159
SCHO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTSD | SCHO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $55 | $400 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $216 | $1,553 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $638 | $4,521 |
- 0.25%FTSD
- 0.03%SCHO, cheaper
- Middle half of Treasuries (1-3 Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
SCHO cheapest of 15 funds
FTSD 12th cheapest of 15 funds
FTSD vs SCHO Dividends
- FTSD 4.78%, better
- SCHO 4.18%
- FTSD $4.27
- SCHO $1.00
- FTSD $0.32
- SCHO $0.08
- FTSD Nov 2, 2026
- SCHO Nov 2, 2026
- FTSD Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SCHO Pays Nov 6, 2026
- FTSD Monthly
- SCHO Monthly
Distribution history
FTSD vs SCHO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTSD
- SCHO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTSD 1.4%, betterSCHO 1.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTSD 0.19, betterSCHO −0.17
- Worst fall
- FTSD −4.7%, betterSCHO −5.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FTSD 0.17SCHO 0.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.