FTSL ranks 4th and PFRL 9th of 11 funds in the Bank Loan Category.
FTSL vs PFRL
FTSL −0.02pt a year
0.70%0.72%
FTSL 15.7×the volume
292K18.6K
PFRL +1.4pt
+6.4%+7.8%
FTSL vs PFRL Performance
+3.3%+5.0%
- FTSL 0.70%, better
- PFRL 0.72%
- FTSL $2.49B
- PFRL $138M
- FTSL +3.3%
- PFRL +5.0%, better
- FTSL 6.28%
- PFRL 6.74%, better
- FTSL 377
- PFRL 422
- FTSL 292K sh, better
- PFRL 18.6K sh
- FTSL $44.49
- PFRL $49.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTSL | PFRL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17Higher | F4 |
| Mission | B62Higher | D31 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | A90Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C46 |
Rank among Bank Loan funds
Same Category. FTSL and PFRL are both graded against the same 11 Bank Loan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTSLC
PFRLD
In short
FTSL Most funds in the high-yield aisle own fixed-coupon junk bonds. FTSL owns first-lien senior bank loans whose coupons float with short-term rates, chosen by a live credit team instead of an index rulebook, with income paid monthly.
PFRL Senior bank loans in ETF form, actively picked by PGIM's credit desk instead of cloned from an index. Coupons float with short-term rates, income lands monthly, and the fee sits right at the category median.
Stated mandate
FTSL The fund seeks high current income and secondarily aims to preserve capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in first-lien senior floating-rate bank loans, primarily to North American businesses.
PFRL The Fund seeks to maximize current income, with capital appreciation as a secondary objective. It primarily invests in senior floating-rate loans.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTSL vs PFRL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTSL vs PFRL Cost
Overpaying PFRL vs FTSL
$351
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTSL 0.70%
$13,606
PFRL 0.72%
$13,957
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTSL | PFRL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,284 | $34 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $4,888 | $128 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $13,957 | $351 |
- 0.70%FTSL, cheaper
- 0.72%PFRL
- Middle half of Bank Loan funds
- Median 0.61%
FTSL 9th cheapest of 11 funds
PFRL 11th cheapest of 11 funds
FTSL vs PFRL Dividends
- FTSL 6.28%
- PFRL 6.74%, better
- FTSL $2.80
- PFRL $3.31
- FTSL $0.23
- PFRL $0.24
- FTSL Oct 21, 2026
- PFRL Oct 30, 2026
- FTSL Oct 30, 2026
- PFRL Pays Nov 3, 2026
- FTSL Monthly
- PFRL Monthly
Distribution history
FTSL vs PFRL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTSL 2.0%, betterPFRL 2.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTSL 0.88PFRL 1.21, better
- Worst fall
- FTSL −7.0%PFRL −8.8%
- Market sensitivity
- FTSL 0.06PFRL 0.08
FTSL and PFRL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
