FTSL ranks 4th and SRLN 8th of 11 funds in the Bank Loan Category.
FTSL vs SRLN
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.70%0.70%
SRLN 7.4×the volume
292K2.17M
SRLN +0.2pt
+4.3%+4.5%
FTSL vs SRLN Performance
+28.3%+26.0%
- FTSL 0.70%
- SRLN 0.70%
- FTSL $2.49B
- SRLN $5.19B
- FTSL +3.3%
- SRLN +3.8%, better
- FTSL 6.28%
- SRLN 7.34%, better
- FTSL 377
- SRLN 654
- FTSL 292K sh
- SRLN 2.17M sh, better
- FTSL $44.49
- SRLN $40.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FTSL | SRLN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | F17 |
| Mission | B62Higher | B61 |
| Risk | C52Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | A90Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A85 | A89Higher |
Rank among Bank Loan funds
Same Category. FTSL and SRLN are both graded against the same 11 Bank Loan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FTSLC
SRLNC
In short
FTSL Most funds in the high-yield aisle own fixed-coupon junk bonds. FTSL owns first-lien senior bank loans whose coupons float with short-term rates, chosen by a live credit team instead of an index rulebook, with income paid monthly.
SRLN Most bond funds buy fixed coupons. This one buys senior loans, actively picked with Blackstone's credit team on the nameplate, about 700 of them, with income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
FTSL The fund seeks high current income and secondarily aims to preserve capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in first-lien senior floating-rate bank loans, primarily to North American businesses.
SRLN The fund is actively managed and seeks current income consistent with preserving capital. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in Senior Loans.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FTSL vs SRLN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FTSL vs SRLN Cost
Same expense ratio
$13,606
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FTSL 0.70%
$13,606
SRLN 0.70%
$13,606
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FTSL | SRLN |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,250 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $4,760 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $13,606 |
- 0.70%FTSL
- 0.70%SRLN
- Middle half of Bank Loan funds
- Median 0.61%
FTSL 9th cheapest of 11 funds
SRLN 9th cheapest of 11 funds
FTSL vs SRLN Dividends
- FTSL 6.28%
- SRLN 7.34%, better
- FTSL $2.80
- SRLN $2.94
- FTSL $0.23
- SRLN $0.25
- FTSL Oct 21, 2026
- SRLN Oct 1, 2026
- FTSL Oct 30, 2026
- SRLN Oct 6, 2026
- FTSL Monthly
- SRLN Monthly
Distribution history
FTSL vs SRLN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FTSL
- SRLN
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FTSL 2.0%, betterSRLN 2.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- FTSL 0.88, betterSRLN 0.86
- Worst fall
- FTSL −7.0%, betterSRLN −7.9%
- Market sensitivity
- FTSL 0.06SRLN 0.03
FTSL and SRLN in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

