MCHI ranks 3rd and FXI 12th of 28 funds in the China Category.
FXI vs MCHI
MCHI −0.14pt a year
0.73%0.59%
FXI 8.7×the volume
19.5M2.24M
MCHI +0.9pt
+1.4%+2.3%
FXI vs MCHI Performance
−7.2%−20.6%
- FXI 0.73%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- FXI $3.77B
- MCHI $5.49B
- FXI −15.2%, better
- MCHI −21.3%
- FXI 2.05%
- MCHI 2.23%, better
- FXI 55
- MCHI 581
- FXI 19.5M sh, better
- MCHI 2.24M sh
- FXI $32.92
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXI | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D31 | A78Higher |
| Mission | B63 | A87Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | A96Higher | A88 |
| Holdings | D38 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A89 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. FXI and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXIB
MCHIA
In short
FXI The old-guard China trade: since 2004, FXI has held about 50 of the largest Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong, and it is built for heavy, fast trading more than for lowest-cost buy-and-hold.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
FXI The fund seeks to track an index of large-capitalization Chinese equities traded on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXI vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXI vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying FXI vs MCHI
$2,498
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXI 0.73%
$14,133
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXI | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,302 | $1,058 | $244 |
| 20 | $4,952 | $4,051 | $901 |
| 30 | $14,133 | $11,635 | $2,498 |
- 0.73%FXI
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
FXI 20th cheapest of 28 funds
FXI vs MCHI Dividends
- FXI 2.05%
- MCHI 2.23%, better
- FXI $0.68
- MCHI $1.10
- FXI $0.26
- MCHI $0.36
- FXI Jun 15, 2026
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- FXI Jun 18, 2026
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- FXI Twice a year
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
FXI vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXI
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXI 21.5%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FXI 0.42, betterMCHI 0.26
- Worst fall
- FXI −48.9%, betterMCHI −49.2%
- Market sensitivity
- FXI 0.47MCHI 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.73% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.73% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.73% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





