CXSE ranks 1st and MCHI 3rd of 28 funds in the China Category.
CXSE vs MCHI
CXSE −0.27pt a year
0.32%0.59%
MCHI 60.1×the volume
37.2K2.24M
CXSE +0.8pt
+3.1%+2.3%
CXSE vs MCHI Performance
−39.0%−20.6%
- CXSE 0.32%, better
- MCHI 0.59%
- CXSE $372M
- MCHI $5.49B
- CXSE −24.9%
- MCHI −21.3%, better
- CXSE 2.22%
- MCHI 2.23%, better
- CXSE 241
- MCHI 581
- CXSE 37.2K sh
- MCHI 2.24M sh, better
- CXSE $31.37
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | CXSE | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A87 |
| Risk | C47 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | B63 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | A74Higher | B58 |
| Durability | A79 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. CXSE and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
CXSEA
MCHIA
In short
CXSE CXSE tracks an index that screens state-owned enterprises out of China, leaving the privately run companies. A tilt toward entrepreneurs rather than Beijing's balance sheet, at a fee well under the typical China fund.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
CXSE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
CXSE vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
CXSE vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying MCHI vs CXSE
$5,093
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
CXSE 0.32%
$6,542
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | CXSE | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $580 | $1,058 | $478 |
| 20 | $2,250 | $4,051 | $1,801 |
| 30 | $6,542 | $11,635 | $5,093 |
- 0.32%CXSE, cheaper
- 0.59%MCHI
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
CXSE 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
CXSE vs MCHI Dividends
- CXSE 2.22%
- MCHI 2.23%, better
- CXSE $0.69
- MCHI $1.10
- CXSE $0.26
- MCHI $0.36
- CXSE Sep 25, 2026
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- CXSE Sep 29, 2026
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- CXSE Quarterly
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
CXSE vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- CXSE
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- CXSE 24.9%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- CXSE 0.12MCHI 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- CXSE −57.6%MCHI −49.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- CXSE 0.75MCHI 0.63
CXSE and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.32% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.32% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.56%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





