Skip to content

KWEB vs MCHI

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWEBCNYSE Arca

iShares MSCI China ETF

MCHIANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

MCHI −0.10pt a year

KWEB0.69%MCHI0.59%

Avg volume · 30D

KWEB 8.0×the volume

KWEB17.9MMCHI2.24M

10Y return · a year

MCHI +5.5pt

KWEB−3.2%MCHI+2.3%

KWEB vs MCHI Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−42.9%KWEB−20.6%MCHI

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. KWEB −42.9%. MCHI −20.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−50%−30%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
KWEB 0.69%
MCHI 0.59%, better
Fund size
KWEB $4.22B
MCHI $5.49B
1Y total return
KWEB −39.6%
MCHI −21.3%, better
Yield (12M)
KWEB 9.22%, better
MCHI 2.23%
Holdings
KWEB 46
MCHI 581
Avg volume (30D)
KWEB 17.9M sh, better
MCHI 2.24M sh
NAV per share
KWEB $22.70
MCHI $48.89
52W range

ETF.net Grade

KWEB: Cost 38, Risk 16, Mission not scored, Tradability 77, Holdings 35, Durability 79. MCHI: Cost 78, Risk 62, Mission 87, Tradability 88, Holdings 58, Durability 91.
Pillar letters and Scores for KWEB, MCHI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarKWEBMCHI
Cost30% weightD38A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA87
Risk15% weightF16B62Higher
Tradability15% weightA77A88Higher
Holdings10% weightD35B58Higher
Durability5% weightA79A91Higher

Rank among China funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. KWEB and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

China⁠

Category · 28 funds
See all 28 ›

MCHI ranks 3rd and KWEB 21st of 28 funds in the China Category.

  1. Rank 1ACXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises FundScore 81
  2. Rank 2AFLCHFranklin FTSE China ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AMCHIiShares MSCI China ETFScore 77
  4. Rank 4AGXCState Street SPDR S&P China ETFScore 76
  5. Rank 20CNBCENeuberger Berman China Equity ETFScore 44
  6. Rank 21CKWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETFScore 43
  7. Rank 22CCCPXCorgi China 2x Daily ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

KWEBCKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

MCHIAiShares MSCI China ETF

In short

KWEB China's internet giants, undiluted: roughly 30 offshore-listed names instead of a whole-market basket. Live since 2013, KWEB is the ticker traders reach for when they want to express a view on China tech.

MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.

Stated mandate

KWEB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, which covers publicly traded China-based companies focused primarily on internet and internet-related businesses.

MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.

Why people hold it

  • KWEB Tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index: about 30 China-based internet companies listed in Hong Kong, on NASDAQ or the NYSE. A sector bet, not a country bet.kraneshares.com
  • Among the most actively traded funds in the China group, with an options market deep enough that KraneShares runs a covered-call fund written on KWEB itself.kraneshares.com
  • At 0.69% a year, the fee sits right at the median for its China peer group despite the narrow single-theme mandate.
  • Trading since 2013 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund: a long operating history for a single-country thematic product.
  • MCHI One ticker, roughly 600 Chinese stocks. Instead of picking among share classes and listings, you get the MSCI China Index (Net) in a single line item.ishares.com
  • 0.59% expense ratio, below the middle of the single-country China pack, and the fund has hewed closely to its stated index mandate.
  • Running since 2011 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, which is why it turns up as the reference China holding in so many portfolios.
  • One of the stronger implementations in its peer group on tradability and staying power, both scored in the top tier of the China cohort.

Worth knowing

  • KWEB About 30 stocks, one sector, one country. That concentration cuts both ways, and price swings run large next to broad China funds.
  • The index covers offshore listings only (Hong Kong, NASDAQ, NYSE), so mainland-listed A-share internet names sit outside the portfolio.kraneshares.com
  • Whole-market China exposure is cheaper: FLCH charges 0.19% and MCHI 0.59%, both spanning the full market rather than one theme.
  • MCHI Cheaper broad-China options exist: FLCH charges 0.19% and JPMorgan's active JCHI 0.15%. You are paying up for MCHI's depth and liquidity.
  • Single-country equity risk, undiluted. Chinese regulation, currency and policy swings hit the whole basket at once, and the index leans heavily on its biggest names.
  • Distributions come once or twice a year, not monthly, so cash flow arrives in lumps.

Full KWEB profile⁠

Full MCHI profile⁠

KWEB vs MCHI Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

KWEB vs MCHI Cost

Overpaying KWEB vs MCHI

$1,794

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • KWEB 0.69%

    $13,429

  • MCHI 0.59%

    $11,635

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • KWEB 0.69%
  • MCHI 0.59%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530KWEB $13,429MCHI $11,635

Year by year

YearKWEBMCHIOverpaying
10$1,232$1,058$174
20$4,697$4,051$646
30$13,429$11,635$1,794

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%KWEB
  • 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
  • Middle half of China funds
  • Median 0.65%

MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds

KWEB 17th cheapest of 28 funds

KWEB vs MCHI Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
KWEB 9.22%, better
MCHI 2.23%
Payout (12M)
KWEB $2.10
MCHI $1.10
Last payment
KWEB $2.10
MCHI $0.36
Ex-dividend
KWEB Dec 22, 2025
MCHI Jun 15, 2026
Paid on
KWEB Dec 23, 2025
MCHI Jun 18, 2026
Frequency
KWEB Annual
MCHI Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

KWEBAnnual · 9 paymentsAll KWEB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 19, 2017 $0.34; Dec 26, 2018 $1.27; Dec 27, 2019 $0.04; Dec 29, 2020 $0.22; Dec 29, 2021 $2.58; Dec 18, 2023 $0.42; Dec 27, 2023 $0.04; Dec 17, 2024 $1.02; Dec 22, 2025 $2.10. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
MCHITwice a year · 19 paymentsAll MCHI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 20, 2017 $0.19; Dec 19, 2017 $0.85; Jun 19, 2018 $0.32; Dec 18, 2018 $0.53; Jun 17, 2019 $0.36; Dec 16, 2019 $0.57; Jun 15, 2020 $0.24; Dec 14, 2020 $0.60; Jun 10, 2021 $0.18; Dec 13, 2021 $0.48; Jun 9, 2022 $0.31; Dec 13, 2022 $0.71; Jun 7, 2023 $0.43; Dec 20, 2023 $0.99; Jun 11, 2024 $0.19; Dec 17, 2024 $0.89; Jun 16, 2025 $0.54; Dec 16, 2025 $0.74; Jun 15, 2026 $0.36. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

KWEB vs MCHI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • KWEB
  • MCHI
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: KWEB −61.9% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−60%−40%−20%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
KWEB 31.1%MCHI 21.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
KWEB −0.03MCHI 0.26, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
KWEB −61.9%MCHI −49.2%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
KWEB 0.88MCHI 0.63

KWEB and MCHI in the news

Popular comparisons

  • KWEBCvsCXSEA

    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsCXSEA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.32%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KWEBCvsFLCHA

    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsFLCHA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · Franklin FTSE China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.19%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • KWEBCvsGXCA

    KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • MCHIAvsGXCA

    iShares MSCI China ETF · State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.59% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.