MCHI ranks 3rd and KWEB 21st of 28 funds in the China Category.
KWEB vs MCHI
MCHI −0.10pt a year
0.69%0.59%
KWEB 8.0×the volume
17.9M2.24M
MCHI +5.5pt
−3.2%+2.3%
KWEB vs MCHI Performance
−42.9%−20.6%
- KWEB 0.69%
- MCHI 0.59%, better
- KWEB $4.22B
- MCHI $5.49B
- KWEB −39.6%
- MCHI −21.3%, better
- KWEB 9.22%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- KWEB 46
- MCHI 581
- KWEB 17.9M sh, better
- MCHI 2.24M sh
- KWEB $22.70
- MCHI $48.89
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | KWEB | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A78Higher |
| Mission | A87 | |
| Risk | F16 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | A77 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | D35 | B58Higher |
| Durability | A79 | A91Higher |
Rank among China funds
Same Category. KWEB and MCHI are both graded against the same 28 China funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
KWEBC
MCHIA
In short
KWEB China's internet giants, undiluted: roughly 30 offshore-listed names instead of a whole-market basket. Live since 2013, KWEB is the ticker traders reach for when they want to express a view on China tech.
MCHI The default one-ticker way to own China. MCHI has tracked the MSCI China Index since 2011, holding roughly 600 stocks open to international investors, and it stays actively traded.
Stated mandate
KWEB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, which covers publicly traded China-based companies focused primarily on internet and internet-related businesses.
MCHI The fund seeks to track an index of Chinese equities available to international investors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
KWEB vs MCHI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
KWEB vs MCHI Cost
Overpaying KWEB vs MCHI
$1,794
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
KWEB 0.69%
$13,429
MCHI 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | KWEB | MCHI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,232 | $1,058 | $174 |
| 20 | $4,697 | $4,051 | $646 |
| 30 | $13,429 | $11,635 | $1,794 |
- 0.69%KWEB
- 0.59%MCHI, cheaper
- Middle half of China funds
- Median 0.65%
MCHI 5th cheapest of 28 funds
KWEB 17th cheapest of 28 funds
KWEB vs MCHI Dividends
- KWEB 9.22%, better
- MCHI 2.23%
- KWEB $2.10
- MCHI $1.10
- KWEB $2.10
- MCHI $0.36
- KWEB Dec 22, 2025
- MCHI Jun 15, 2026
- KWEB Dec 23, 2025
- MCHI Jun 18, 2026
- KWEB Annual
- MCHI Twice a year
Distribution history
KWEB vs MCHI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- KWEB
- MCHI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- KWEB 31.1%MCHI 21.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- KWEB −0.03MCHI 0.26, better
- Worst fall
- KWEB −61.9%MCHI −49.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- KWEB 0.88MCHI 0.63
KWEB and MCHI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.69% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





