XLE ranks 1st and FXN 11th of 24 funds in the Energy (Broad) Category.
FXN vs XLE
XLE −0.55pt a year
0.63%0.08%
XLE 23.7×the volume
1.28M30.2M
XLE +3.7pt
+8.2%+11.9%
FXN vs XLE Performance
+123.7%+190.1%
- FXN 0.63%
- XLE 0.08%, better
- FXN $407M
- XLE $45.3B
- FXN +60.8%
- XLE +63.4%, better
- FXN 1.68%
- XLE 2.18%, better
- FXN 41
- XLE 24
- FXN 1.28M sh
- XLE 30.2M sh, better
- FXN $24.99
- XLE $68.72
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXN | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A98Higher |
| Mission | B67 | |
| Risk | D25 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | A77 | A97Higher |
| Holdings | A89Higher | D37 |
| Durability | B69 | A88Higher |
Rank among Energy (Broad) funds
Same Category. FXN and XLE are both graded against the same 24 Energy (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXNC
XLEA
In short
FXN Energy exposure without the two-giant problem. FXN ranks Russell 1000 energy names on growth and value marks, keeps the best scorers, and tier-weights about 40 of them so smaller drillers carry real weight. Running since 2007.
XLE The 1998 original and still the default way to trade US energy: XLE holds only the oil, gas and oilfield services names inside the S&P 500, capped-weighted, for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
FXN The Fund seeks to track before expenses the price and yield of the StrataQuant® Energy Index, an enhanced index using the AlphaDEX® methodology to select energy-sector stocks.
XLE The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Energy Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXN vs XLE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXN vs XLE Cost
Overpaying FXN vs XLE
$10,670
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXN 0.63%
$12,359
XLE 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXN | XLE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,128 | $147 | $981 |
| 20 | $4,311 | $575 | $3,736 |
| 30 | $12,359 | $1,689 | $10,670 |
- 0.63%FXN
- 0.08%XLE, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy (Broad) funds
- Median 0.46%
XLE cheapest of 24 funds
FXN 17th cheapest of 24 funds
FXN vs XLE Dividends
- FXN 1.68%
- XLE 2.18%, better
- FXN $0.42
- XLE $1.52
- FXN $0.16
- XLE $0.38
- FXN Sep 24, 2026
- XLE Sep 21, 2026
- FXN Sep 30, 2026
- XLE Sep 23, 2026
- FXN Quarterly
- XLE Quarterly
Distribution history
FXN vs XLE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXN
- XLE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXN 22.8%XLE 21.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FXN 0.56XLE 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- FXN −31.7%XLE −26.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FXN 0.06XLE −0.02
FXN and XLE in the news


Category Rankings
Chips, AI and crypto took October's losses




Popular comparisons
- 0.63% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.63% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.