RWM ranks 4th and FXP 28th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
FXP vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 7968.8×the volume
3.77K30M
RWM +9.4pt
−20.5%−11.1%
FXP vs RWM Performance
−63.6%−18.3%
- FXP 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- FXP $6M
- RWM $163M
- FXP +35.5%, better
- RWM −10.2%
- FXP 2.19%
- RWM 3.32%, better
- FXP 1
- RWM 3
- FXP 3.77K sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- FXP $23.15
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FXP | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B56 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | F16 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | C49 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. FXP and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FXPC
RWMB
In short
FXP The only US ETF built to move two times the opposite of the FTSE China 50, the 50 largest Chinese companies listed in Hong Kong. Live since 2007, and it resets daily: a trading instrument, not a set-and-forget China short.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
FXP FXP seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the FTSE China 50 Index’s daily performance. It is intended to gain when that index declines and lose when it rises.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FXP vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FXP vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FXP 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FXP | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%FXP
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
FXP 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
FXP vs RWM Dividends
- FXP 2.19%
- RWM 3.32%, better
- FXP $0.51
- RWM $0.48
- FXP $0.12
- RWM $0.09
- FXP Sep 23, 2026
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- FXP Sep 29, 2026
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- FXP Quarterly
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
FXP vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FXP
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FXP 40.0%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FXP −0.77, betterRWM −0.99
- Worst fall
- FXP −88.3%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- FXP −0.61RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.