ILCG ranks 2nd and FYC 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
FYC vs ILCG
ILCG −0.66pt a year
0.70%0.04%
FYC 1.1×the volume
79.2K70.4K
ILCG +3.1pt
+14.2%+17.3%
FYC vs ILCG Performance
+54.4%+59.5%
- FYC 0.70%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- FYC $1.35B
- ILCG $3B
- FYC +20.3%, better
- ILCG +3.2%
- FYC 0.11%
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- FYC 263
- ILCG 328
- FYC 79.2K sh, better
- ILCG 70.4K sh
- FYC $114.02
- ILCG $109.98
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FYC | ILCG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A87 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C48Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | C40 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B59 | B64Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. FYC and ILCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FYCC
ILCGA
In short
FYC Small-cap growth, but not by market cap. The AlphaDEX screen ranks the Nasdaq US 700 Small Cap universe on growth and value factors, keeps the best scorers, tiers their weights by rank, and reshuffles quarterly. Rules-based stock picking, not index hugging.
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
FYC The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index through an indexing approach.
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FYC vs ILCG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FYC vs ILCG Cost
Overpaying FYC vs ILCG
$12,757
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FYC 0.70%
$13,606
ILCG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FYC | ILCG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $73 | $1,177 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $288 | $4,472 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $849 | $12,757 |
- 0.70%FYC
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
FYC 35th cheapest of 35 funds
FYC vs ILCG Dividends
- FYC 0.11%
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- FYC $0.13
- ILCG $0.48
- FYC $0.13
- ILCG $0.14
- FYC Jun 25, 2026
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- FYC Jun 30, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- FYC Irregular
- ILCG Quarterly
Distribution history
FYC vs ILCG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FYC
- ILCG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FYC 20.4%ILCG 17.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FYC 1.18, betterILCG 1.06
- Worst fall
- FYC −35.4%ILCG −35.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- FYC 1.19ILCG 1.23
FYC and ILCG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
