Skip to content

GABF vs TMED

Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF

GABFFNYSE Arca

T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

TMEDANasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

TMED −0.80pt a year

GABF1.24%TMED0.44%

Avg volume · 30D

TMED 2.8×the volume

GABF2.67KTMED7.43K

GABF vs TMED Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−3.1%GABF+19.9%TMED

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. GABF −3.1%. TMED +19.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%10%30%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GABF 1.24%
TMED 0.44%, better
Fund size
GABF $51M
TMED $34M
1Y total return
GABF −3.1%
TMED +19.9%, better
Yield (12M)
GABF 2.05%
TMED No data
Holdings
GABF 43
TMED 112
Avg volume (30D)
GABF 2.67K sh
TMED 7.43K sh, better
NAV per share
GABF $43.99
TMED $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GABF: Cost 0, Risk 33, Mission 72, Tradability 27, Holdings 69, Durability 52. TMED: Cost 82, Risk 55, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 91, Durability 35.
Pillar letters and Scores for GABF, TMED, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGABFTMED
Cost30% weightF0A82Higher
Mission25% weightA72Not scored
Risk15% weightD33B55Higher
Tradability15% weightD27B59Higher
Holdings10% weightB69A91Higher
Durability5% weightC52HigherD35

Rank among US Active Sector funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GABF and TMED are both graded against the same 35 US Active Sector funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Sector⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

TMED ranks 2nd and GABF 34th of 35 funds in the US Active Sector Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVREAvantis Real Estate ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2APSRInvesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETFScore 70
  3. Rank 2ATMEDT. Rowe Price Health Care ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BTRUTVanEck Technology TruSector ETFScore 69
  5. Rank 32DMEDXHorizon Kinetics Medical ETFScore 29
  6. Rank 34FGABFGabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETFScore 24
  7. Rank 34FHVACAdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETFScore 24

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GABFFGabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF

TMEDAT. Rowe Price Health Care ETF

In short

GABF Mario Gabelli's deal-hunting playbook, pointed at one sector: GABF runs an actively managed, concentrated book of financial-services stocks picked on what a strategic buyer would pay and what might unlock that value.

TMED No data

Stated mandate

GABF The Fund seeks concentrated exposure to companies principally engaged in financial-services industries, investing at least 80% of net assets in those companies' securities under normal conditions.

TMED No data

Why people hold it

  • GABF Private Market Value with a Catalyst: holdings are sized against what a strategic buyer would pay for the whole company, with an eye on the trigger (buyout, management change) that could surface it.gabelli.com
  • Active and fully transparent: holdings are disclosed daily, so the concentrated, non-diversified portfolio is visible rather than inferred from quarterly reports.gabelli.comgabelli.com 2
  • A narrow, clearly drawn mandate: at least 80% of net assets in financial-services companies under normal conditions, run with a value discipline instead of as an index clone.

TMED No data

Worth knowing

  • GABF Costs 1.24% net of a waiver through April 30, 2027 (1.64% gross), above the category median; index-style rivals such as TRUT (0.14%) and AVRE (0.17%) sit far below.
  • A small fund that trades lightly, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads and more price impact on larger orders than the category's household names.
  • Non-diversified and tied to one sector, so a single issuer or a financials-wide swing moves it hard; cash goes out once or twice a year, not monthly.gabelli.com

TMED No data

Full GABF profile⁠

Full TMED profile⁠

GABF vs TMED Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GABF vs TMED Cost

Overpaying GABF vs TMED

$13,611

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GABF 1.24%

    $22,463

  • TMED 0.44%

    $8,852

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GABF 1.24%
  • TMED 0.44%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530GABF $22,463TMED $8,852

Year by year

YearGABFTMEDOverpaying
10$2,164$794$1,370
20$8,047$3,061$4,986
30$22,463$8,852$13,611

Expense ratio

  • 1.24%GABF
  • 0.44%TMED, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Active Sector funds
  • Median 0.61%

TMED 7th cheapest of 35 funds

GABF 35th cheapest of 35 funds

GABF vs TMED Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GABF 2.05%
TMED No data
Payout (12M)
GABF $0.91
TMED No data
Last payment
GABF $0.91
TMED $0.16
Ex-dividend
GABF Dec 29, 2025
TMED Dec 23, 2025
Paid on
GABF Jan 9, 2026
TMED Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
GABF Annual
TMED Irregular

Distribution history

Per share, 2022 to 2026, same scale for both

GABFAnnual · 4 paymentsAll GABF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 4 payments from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2022 $0.33; Dec 27, 2023 $1.62; Dec 27, 2024 $1.91; Dec 29, 2025 $0.91. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD
TMEDIrregular · 1 paymentAll TMED payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2022 to 2026 YTD. Dec 23, 2025 $0.16. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD

GABF vs TMED Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GABF 17.2%TMED 14.7%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GABF 0.87TMED 1.50since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GABF −20.9%since May 2022TMED −11.1%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GABF 0.88TMED 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • GABFFvsAVREA

    Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.24% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDAvsAVREA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Avantis Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.17%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GABFFvsPSRA

    Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.24% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDAvsPSRA

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GABFFvsTRUTB

    Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.24% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • TMEDAvsTRUTB

    T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF · VanEck Technology TruSector ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.44% · 0.14%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.