Skip to content

GCAD vs ITA

Gabelli Commercial Aerospace and Defense ETF

GCADCNYSE Arca

iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

ITAACboe

Overlap

47.8%by weight

Expense ratio

ITA −0.53pt a year

GCAD0.90%ITA0.37%

Avg volume · 30D

ITA 120.2×the volume

GCAD6.21KITA747K

3Y return · a year

GCAD +2.6pt

GCAD+27.4%ITA+24.8%

GCAD vs ITA Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

+11.2%GCAD−0.3%ITA

Oct 31, 2025 to Nov 2, 2026. GCAD +11.2%. ITA −0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%30%Oct 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GCAD 0.90%
ITA 0.37%, better
Fund size
GCAD $45M
ITA $12.2B
1Y total return
GCAD +11.2%, better
ITA −0.3%
Yield (12M)
GCAD 1.91%, better
ITA 0.26%
Holdings
GCAD 57
ITA 52
Avg volume (30D)
GCAD 6.21K sh
ITA 747K sh, better
NAV per share
GCAD $49.94
ITA $209.66
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GCAD: Cost 12, Risk 76, Mission 79, Tradability 44, Holdings 59, Durability 53. ITA: Cost 80, Risk 62, Mission 76, Tradability 96, Holdings 34, Durability 98.
Pillar letters and Scores for GCAD, ITA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGCADITA
Cost30% weightF12A80Higher
Mission25% weightA79HigherA76
Risk15% weightA76HigherB62
Tradability15% weightC44A96Higher
Holdings10% weightB59HigherD34
Durability5% weightC53A98Higher

Rank among Defense & Aerospace funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GCAD and ITA are both graded against the same 25 Defense & Aerospace funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Defense & Aerospace⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

ITA ranks 2nd and GCAD 14th of 25 funds in the Defense & Aerospace Category.

  1. Rank 1AXARState Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 78
  2. Rank 2AITAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3BFLDZTrueShares Patriot Defense ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 14CDUTYU.S. Defense ETFScore 40
  5. Rank 14CGCADGabelli Commercial Aerospace and Defense ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 14CWARU.S. Global Technology and Aerospace & Defense ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GCADCGabelli Commercial Aerospace and Defense ETF

ITAAiShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF

In short

GCAD A stock-picker's defense fund. Gabelli runs GCAD without a declared index, chasing total return with an emphasis on income, an unusual mandate in a corner of the market where index trackers set the rules.

ITA The 2006 original in aerospace and defense, and still the anchor fund of the category. It follows a market-cap-weighted index of U.S. aircraft, parts and weapons makers, so the big primes carry most of the weight.

Stated mandate

GCAD The Fund seeks a high level of total return, emphasizing income.

ITA The fund is designed to follow an index of U.S. equity companies focused on aerospace and defense.

Why people hold it

  • GCAD No index to follow. The mandate is total return with an income emphasis, so the portfolio reflects Gabelli's own calls rather than a benchmark's weighting rules.
  • Trading since 2022, so there is a multi-year live record in the aerospace and defense theme to judge, not a backtest.
  • The book stays on-theme: holdings line up closely with the commercial aerospace and defense mandate on the label, with little drift into loosely related names.
  • ITA Charges 0.37% a year, below the typical defense-fund fee and a whisker off the cheapest large rival, XAR at 0.35%.
  • Trading since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar, actively traded fund: the long-standing incumbent in U.S. aerospace and defense.
  • The index weights by market cap but caps any single company's weight, so the biggest primes lead without swallowing the whole portfolio.spglobal.com
  • One of the strongest builds in a crowded defense peer group, with a plain-vanilla index mandate and quarterly payouts.

Worth knowing

  • GCAD Costs 0.90% a year, well above the defense-theme median of 0.50%. Index rivals XAR (0.35%) and ITA (0.37%) cover the sector for a fraction of that.
  • A small, thinly traded fund. Spreads tend to run wider than the big index names, and larger orders can push the price around.
  • Income sits in the objective, but cash reaches shareholders on an annual or semiannual schedule, not monthly.
  • ITA About 50 stocks, cap-weighted: a few primes drive most of the ride. XAR's modified equal weight spreads exposure further down the size ladder.ssga.com
  • One U.S. industry, running on two engines: government procurement and commercial aircraft demand. Narrower than a broad-market fund by design.ishares.com
  • Holds a representative sample of the index rather than every constituent, which can leave small gaps versus the benchmark.sec.gov

Full GCAD profile⁠

Full ITA profile⁠

GCAD vs ITA Holdings

How GCAD and ITA differ

Overlap by weight

47.8%

Shared holdings make up 90.4% of ITA and 75.2% of GCAD.

Level by level

  • Sector6 Sectors0.0%
  • Holdings33 in both47.8%
  • Countryby domicile95.1%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in GCAD and ITA, widest gap first
SectorMore in GCADMore in ITA
Aerospace & DefenseITA +99.9 points
IndustrialsGCAD +90.5 points
Consumer DiscretionaryGCAD +7.1 points
CommunicationGCAD +1.4 points
TechnologyGCAD +1.0 points
Leisure ProductsITA +0.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GCAD and ITA, widest gap first
CountryMore in GCADMore in ITA
United StatesITA +4.9 points
GermanyGCAD +2.0 points
CanadaGCAD +1.2 points
United KingdomGCAD +0.7 points
IsraelGCAD +0.6 points
JapanGCAD +0.4 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GCAD50.6%
  • ITA76.3%

Securities held

  • GCAD57
  • ITA50

Asset class

GCAD
Equity
ITA
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GCAD24
  • In both33
  • Only in ITA17

Only in GCAD

24 securities, 24.8% of GCAD by weight

  • Albany Intl Corp-Cl A7.19%
  • Crane Co3.03%
  • Treasury Bill 0 12/31/20262.04%

Only in ITA

17 securities, 9.6% of ITA by weight

  • Axon Enterprise2.67%
  • Rocket Lab Corp2.31%
  • Ftai Aviation1.48%

Weight gaps

All 33 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GCAD and ITA, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GCADMore in ITA
General ElectricGEITA +18.62 points
Rtx CorpRTXITA +12.36 points
Ducommun IncDCOGCAD +4.40 points
Moog Inc-Class AMOG.AGCAD +4.15 points
Hexcel CorpHXLGCAD +3.69 points
Textron IncTXTGCAD +2.90 points
Transdigm Group IncTDGITA +2.83 points
Mercury Systems IncMRCYGCAD +2.45 points

All GCAD holdings⁠All 50 ITA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GCAD vs ITA Cost

Overpaying GCAD vs ITA

$9,527

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GCAD 0.90%

    $17,040

  • ITA 0.37%

    $7,513

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GCAD 0.90%
  • ITA 0.37%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GCAD $17,040ITA $7,513

Year by year

YearGCADITAOverpaying
10$1,593$670$923
20$6,015$2,590$3,425
30$17,040$7,513$9,527

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%GCAD
  • 0.37%ITA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Defense & Aerospace funds
  • Median 0.50%

ITA 5th cheapest of 25 funds

GCAD 22nd cheapest of 25 funds

GCAD vs ITA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
GCAD 1.91%, better
ITA 0.26%
Payout (12M)
GCAD $0.96
ITA $0.57
Last payment
GCAD $0.96
ITA $0.25
Ex-dividend
GCAD Dec 29, 2025
ITA Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
GCAD Jan 9, 2026
ITA Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
GCAD Annual
ITA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GCADAnnual · 3 paymentsAll GCAD payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.27; Dec 27, 2024 $0.62; Dec 29, 2025 $0.96. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
ITAQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll ITA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.16; Jun 27, 2017 $0.19; Sep 26, 2017 $0.35; Dec 19, 2017 $0.16; Mar 22, 2018 $0.21; Jun 26, 2018 $0.22; Sep 26, 2018 $0.43; Dec 17, 2018 $0.11; Mar 20, 2019 $0.29; Jun 17, 2019 $0.31; Sep 24, 2019 $0.29; Dec 16, 2019 $0.53; Dec 30, 2019 $0.29; Mar 25, 2020 $0.39; Jun 15, 2020 $0.21; Sep 23, 2020 $0.20; Dec 14, 2020 $0.20; Mar 25, 2021 $0.32; Jun 10, 2021 $0.19; Sep 24, 2021 $0.18; Dec 13, 2021 $0.16; Mar 24, 2022 $0.16; Jun 9, 2022 $0.28; Sep 26, 2022 $0.38; Dec 13, 2022 $0.24; Mar 23, 2023 $0.28; Jun 7, 2023 $0.24; Sep 26, 2023 $0.22; Dec 20, 2023 $0.43; Mar 21, 2024 $0.27; Jun 11, 2024 $0.30; Sep 25, 2024 $0.23; Dec 17, 2024 $0.44; Mar 18, 2025 $0.25; Jun 16, 2025 $0.17; Sep 16, 2025 $0.75; Mar 17, 2026 $0.15; Jun 15, 2026 $0.16; Sep 15, 2026 $0.25. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

GCAD vs ITA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GCAD 17.3%, betterITA 18.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GCAD 1.25, betterITA 1.06
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GCAD −17.8%since Jan 2023ITA −20.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GCAD 0.99ITA 0.98

GCAD and ITA in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GCADCvsXARA

    Gabelli Commercial Aerospace and Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITAAvsXARA

    iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · State Street SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.35%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GCADCvsFLDZB

    Gabelli Commercial Aerospace and Defense ETF · TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITAAvsFLDZB

    iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · TrueShares Patriot Defense ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GCADCvsFOWFB

    Gabelli Commercial Aerospace and Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ITAAvsFOWFB

    iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.37% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.