MSFW ranks 3rd and GDXW 11th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
GDXW vs MSFW
GDXW −0.01pt a year
0.99%1.00%
GDXW 4.1×the volume
52.9K12.9K
GDXW vs MSFW Performance
+1.4%−2.8%
- GDXW 0.99%, better
- MSFW 1.00%
- GDXW $73M
- MSFW $29M
- GDXW +1.4%, better
- MSFW −2.8%
- GDXW
- MSFW 30.11%
- GDXW 3
- MSFW 4
- GDXW 52.9K sh, better
- MSFW 12.9K sh
- GDXW $31.09
- MSFW $32.45
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GDXW | MSFW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | B57 | A93Higher |
| Risk | C41 | C48Higher |
| Tradability | B61Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | D25 | A79Higher |
| Durability | B55Higher | C50 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. GDXW and MSFW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GDXWC
MSFWB
In short
GDXW Gold miners with the leverage dial turned down: GDXW targets 1.2x GDX's weekly total return, resetting Friday to Friday instead of daily, and pays cash out every week.
MSFW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily at 2x. MSFW dials it down: 1.2 times Microsoft's calendar-week total return, a payout every week, 1.00% with no fee waiver.
Stated mandate
GDXW GDXW seeks weekly distributions and weekly returns equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF, before fees and expenses.
MSFW MSFW seeks to provide weekly distributions and calendar-week returns, before fees and expenses, equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Microsoft common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GDXW vs MSFW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GDXW vs MSFW Cost
Overpaying MSFW vs GDXW
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GDXW 0.99%
$18,525
MSFW 1.00%
$18,688
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GDXW | MSFW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,746 | $1,763 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,565 | $6,625 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,525 | $18,688 | $163 |
- 0.99%GDXW, cheaper
- 1.00%MSFW
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
GDXW 3rd cheapest of 17 funds
MSFW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
GDXW vs MSFW Dividends
- GDXW
- MSFW 30.11%
- GDXW
- MSFW $9.79
- GDXW $0.32
- MSFW $0.17
- GDXW Oct 26, 2026
- MSFW Oct 26, 2026
- GDXW Oct 27, 2026
- MSFW Oct 27, 2026
- GDXW Weekly
- MSFW Weekly
Distribution history
GDXW vs MSFW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GDXW 67.6%MSFW 42.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GDXW 0.26MSFW −0.03
- Worst fall
- GDXW −46.7%MSFW −41.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GDXW 0.52MSFW 1.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.