AAPW ranks 1st and GDXW 11th of 17 funds in the Leveraged Single-Stock Income Category.
AAPW vs GDXW
GDXW −0.01pt a year
1.00%0.99%
GDXW 3.8×the volume
14K52.9K
AAPW vs GDXW Performance
+28.3%+1.4%
- AAPW 1.00%
- GDXW 0.99%, better
- AAPW $44M
- GDXW $73M
- AAPW +28.3%, better
- GDXW +1.4%
- AAPW 26.59%
- GDXW
- AAPW 5
- GDXW 3
- AAPW 14K sh
- GDXW 52.9K sh, better
- AAPW $41.43
- GDXW $31.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AAPW | GDXW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C48 | C48 |
| Mission | A88Higher | B57 |
| Risk | A84Higher | C41 |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | C45Higher | D25 |
| Durability | B66Higher | B55 |
Rank among Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
Same Category. AAPW and GDXW are both graded against the same 17 Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AAPWB
GDXWC
In short
AAPW Most leveraged single-stock funds reset daily. AAPW resets on the calendar week, targeting 1.2x Apple's weekly total return before fees, and cuts a distribution check every week. Cost: 1.00%, no waiver.
GDXW Gold miners with the leverage dial turned down: GDXW targets 1.2x GDX's weekly total return, resetting Friday to Friday instead of daily, and pays cash out every week.
Stated mandate
AAPW AAPW seeks income and growth by making weekly distributions while targeting 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of Apple common shares, before fees and expenses.
GDXW GDXW seeks weekly distributions and weekly returns equal to 1.2 times the calendar-week total return of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AAPW vs GDXW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AAPW vs GDXW Cost
Overpaying AAPW vs GDXW
$163
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AAPW 1.00%
$18,688
GDXW 0.99%
$18,525
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AAPW | GDXW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,746 | $17 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $6,565 | $60 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $18,525 | $163 |
- 1.00%AAPW
- 0.99%GDXW, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Single-Stock Income funds
- Median 1.00%
GDXW 3rd cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW 9th cheapest of 17 funds
AAPW vs GDXW Dividends
- AAPW 26.59%
- GDXW
- AAPW $11.02
- GDXW
- AAPW $0.24
- GDXW $0.32
- AAPW Oct 26, 2026
- GDXW Oct 26, 2026
- AAPW Oct 27, 2026
- GDXW Oct 27, 2026
- AAPW Weekly
- GDXW Weekly
Distribution history
AAPW vs GDXW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AAPW 27.1%GDXW 67.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AAPW 0.76GDXW 0.26
- Worst fall
- AAPW −36.3%GDXW −46.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AAPW 1.02GDXW 0.52
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 1.00%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.99% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.