IGIB ranks 2nd and GENT 9th of 9 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate (5-10 Year) Category.
GENT vs IGIB
IGIB −0.34pt a year
0.38%0.04%
IGIB 99.7×the volume
32.4K3.23M
GENT vs IGIB Performance
+0.4%−0.5%
- GENT 0.38%
- IGIB 0.04%, better
- GENT $111M
- IGIB $19.5B
- GENT +0.4%, better
- IGIB −0.5%
- GENT 4.29%
- IGIB 5.11%, better
- GENT 57
- IGIB 3040
- GENT 32.4K sh
- IGIB 3.23M sh, better
- GENT $9.96
- IGIB $51.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GENT | IGIB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F17 | A79Higher |
| Mission | A86 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B60Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | F8 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | F19 | A89Higher |
| Durability | D30 | A84Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate (5-10 Year) funds
Same Category. GENT and IGIB are both graded against the same 9 Investment Grade Corporate (5-10 Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GENTC
IGIBA
In short
GENT A boutique bond manager's core strategy in ETF clothing. Genter picks the bonds itself rather than tracking an index, aiming for steady income with principal protection first, and pays cash out monthly. You pay up for the active hand.
IGIB A precision tool, not a catch-all: IGIB owns only the 5-to-10-year slice of the US investment-grade corporate market, about 3,000 bonds deep, for 0.04% a year. Trading since 2007.
Stated mandate
GENT The fund seeks current income while limiting risk to principal, with capital appreciation as a secondary objective.
IGIB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds with remaining maturities of five to ten years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GENT vs IGIB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GENT vs IGIB Cost
Overpaying GENT vs IGIB
$6,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GENT 0.38%
$7,706
IGIB 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GENT | IGIB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $73 | $615 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $288 | $2,370 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $849 | $6,857 |
- 0.38%GENT
- 0.04%IGIB, cheaper
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate (5-10 Year) funds
- Median 0.19%
IGIB 3rd cheapest of 9 funds
GENT 8th cheapest of 9 funds
GENT vs IGIB Dividends
- GENT 4.29%
- IGIB 5.11%, better
- GENT $0.43
- IGIB $2.60
- GENT $0.03
- IGIB $0.22
- GENT Oct 29, 2026
- IGIB Nov 2, 2026
- GENT Oct 30, 2026
- IGIB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- GENT Monthly
- IGIB Monthly
Distribution history
GENT vs IGIB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GENT 3.1%IGIB 6.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GENT −0.10IGIB 0.45
- Worst fall
- GENT −3.1%IGIB −19.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GENT 0.06IGIB 1.04
GENT and IGIB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
