Skip to content

GFLW vs SCHG

Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF

GFLWCNasdaq

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

SCHGANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

SCHG −0.35pt a year

GFLW0.39%SCHG0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

SCHG 36.0×the volume

GFLW211KSCHG7.59M

GFLW vs SCHG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.7%GFLW+3.3%SCHG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GFLW +7.7%. SCHG +3.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GFLW 0.39%
SCHG 0.04%, better
Fund size
GFLW $1.13B
SCHG $61.7B
1Y total return
GFLW +7.7%, better
SCHG +3.3%
Yield (12M)
GFLW 0.36%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Holdings
GFLW 101
SCHG 187
Avg volume (30D)
GFLW 211K sh
SCHG 7.59M sh, better
NAV per share
GFLW $31.41
SCHG $34.31
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GFLW: Cost 24, Risk 37, Mission 100, Tradability 53, Holdings 69, Durability 25. SCHG: Cost 96, Risk 41, Mission 92, Tradability 87, Holdings 36, Durability 75.
Pillar letters and Scores for GFLW, SCHG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGFLWSCHG
Cost30% weightF24A96Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA92
Risk15% weightD37C41Higher
Tradability15% weightC53A87Higher
Holdings10% weightB69HigherD36
Durability5% weightD25A75Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GFLW and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

SCHG ranks 2nd and GFLW 24th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 5AVUGVanguard Morningstar Growth ETFScore 77
  6. Rank 24CEGUSiShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETFScore 53
  7. Rank 24CGFLWVictoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETFScore 53
  8. Rank 26CPWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GFLWCVictoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF

SCHGASchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

In short

GFLW No data

SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.

Stated mandate

GFLW No data

SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.

Why people hold it

GFLW No data

  • SCHG 0.04% a year against a growth-category median of 0.18%. Costs sit near the floor of the group.
  • Hews closely to the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, one of the tighter index implementations in its peer group.
  • Live since 2009, a multi-billion-dollar fund, and one of the busier tickers in the growth aisle, so entering and exiting is usually cheap and easy.
  • The benchmark is carved out of a total-market growth index, not S&P 500 membership, so a stock does not need an index committee's nod to qualify.

Worth knowing

GFLW No data

  • SCHG Growth-only by design. Value and dividend-heavy corners of the market sit outside the mandate, so the ride differs from a total-market fund.
  • Large-cap U.S. only, roughly 200 stocks. No mid-caps, no small-caps, nothing overseas.
  • VUG charges a hair less for a similar broad-growth mandate. A tiny gap, but it is there. Distributions here arrive quarterly.

Full GFLW profile⁠

Full SCHG profile⁠

GFLW vs SCHG Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GFLW vs SCHG Cost

Overpaying GFLW vs SCHG

$7,049

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GFLW 0.39%

    $7,898

  • SCHG 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GFLW 0.39%
  • SCHG 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GFLW $7,898SCHG $849

Year by year

YearGFLWSCHGOverpaying
10$705$73$632
20$2,725$288$2,437
30$7,898$849$7,049

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%GFLW
  • 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds

GFLW 27th cheapest of 35 funds

GFLW vs SCHG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GFLW 0.36%
SCHG 0.40%, better
Payout (12M)
GFLW $0.11
SCHG $0.14
Last payment
GFLW $0.11
SCHG $0.04
Ex-dividend
GFLW Sep 9, 2026
SCHG Sep 23, 2026
Paid on
GFLW Sep 10, 2026
SCHG Sep 28, 2026
Frequency
GFLW Irregular
SCHG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GFLWIrregular · 5 paymentsAll GFLW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 12, 2024 $0.00059; Dec 26, 2024 $0.0024; Apr 10, 2025 $0.0026; Jul 10, 2025 $0.0038; Sep 9, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD
SCHGQuarterly · 42 paymentsAll SCHG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 42 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.02; Jun 19, 2017 $0.02; Sep 18, 2017 $0.03; Dec 18, 2017 $0.02; Mar 16, 2018 $0.02; Jun 26, 2018 $0.02; Sep 25, 2018 $0.02; Dec 12, 2018 $0.03; Dec 28, 2018 $0.02; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 26, 2019 $0.03; Sep 25, 2019 $0.03; Dec 12, 2019 $0.02; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 24, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.02; Dec 10, 2020 $0.02; Mar 24, 2021 $0.02; Jun 23, 2021 $0.02; Sep 22, 2021 $0.02; Dec 8, 2021 $0.03; Dec 30, 2021 $0.0051; Mar 23, 2022 $0.02; Jun 22, 2022 $0.02; Sep 21, 2022 $0.02; Dec 7, 2022 $0.02; Mar 22, 2023 $0.02; Jun 21, 2023 $0.02; Sep 20, 2023 $0.02; Dec 6, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.0063; Mar 20, 2024 $0.02; Jun 26, 2024 $0.03; Sep 25, 2024 $0.03; Dec 11, 2024 $0.03; Mar 26, 2025 $0.03; Jun 25, 2025 $0.03; Sep 24, 2025 $0.03; Dec 10, 2025 $0.03; Mar 25, 2026 $0.04; Jun 24, 2026 $0.03; Sep 23, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102017202020232026YTD

GFLW vs SCHG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GFLW 19.7%since Jan 2025SCHG 16.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GFLW 0.67since Jan 2025SCHG 1.16
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GFLW −24.1%since Dec 2024SCHG −34.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GFLW 1.25SCHG 1.20

GFLW and SCHG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GFLWCvsSPYGA

    Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsSPYGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GFLWCvsILCGA

    Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsILCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GFLWCvsIMCGA

    Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SCHGAvsIMCGA

    Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.