SCHG ranks 2nd and GFLW 24th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
GFLW vs SCHG
SCHG −0.35pt a year
0.39%0.04%
SCHG 36.0×the volume
211K7.59M
GFLW vs SCHG Performance
+7.7%+3.3%
- GFLW 0.39%
- SCHG 0.04%, better
- GFLW $1.13B
- SCHG $61.7B
- GFLW +7.7%, better
- SCHG +3.3%
- GFLW 0.36%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- GFLW 101
- SCHG 187
- GFLW 211K sh
- SCHG 7.59M sh, better
- GFLW $31.41
- SCHG $34.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GFLW | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F24 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100Higher | A92 |
| Risk | D37 | C41Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D36 |
| Durability | D25 | A75Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. GFLW and SCHG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GFLWC
SCHGA
In short
SCHG Schwab's growth workhorse: roughly 200 large-cap U.S. growth names for four basis points, one of the cheapest tickets in a crowded category. Running since 2009 and among the most heavily traded growth funds around.
Stated mandate
SCHG SCHG seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It generally invests in stocks included in that index, which represents large-cap U.S. growth equities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GFLW vs SCHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GFLW vs SCHG Cost
Overpaying GFLW vs SCHG
$7,049
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GFLW 0.39%
$7,898
SCHG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GFLW | SCHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $73 | $632 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $288 | $2,437 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $849 | $7,049 |
- 0.39%GFLW
- 0.04%SCHG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SCHG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
GFLW 27th cheapest of 35 funds
GFLW vs SCHG Dividends
- GFLW 0.36%
- SCHG 0.40%, better
- GFLW $0.11
- SCHG $0.14
- GFLW $0.11
- SCHG $0.04
- GFLW Sep 9, 2026
- SCHG Sep 23, 2026
- GFLW Sep 10, 2026
- SCHG Sep 28, 2026
- GFLW Irregular
- SCHG Quarterly
Distribution history
GFLW vs SCHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GFLW 19.7%SCHG 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- GFLW 0.67SCHG 1.16
- Worst fall
- GFLW −24.1%SCHG −34.6%
- Market sensitivity
- GFLW 1.25SCHG 1.20
GFLW and SCHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

