Skip to content

GFLW vs IMCG

Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF

GFLWCNasdaq

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

IMCGANYSE Arca

Overlap

17.7%by weight

Expense ratio

IMCG −0.33pt a year

GFLW0.39%IMCG0.06%

Avg volume · 30D

GFLW 1.6×the volume

GFLW211KIMCG132K

GFLW vs IMCG Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.7%GFLW+14.0%IMCG

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. GFLW +7.7%. IMCG +14.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%0%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
GFLW 0.39%
IMCG 0.06%, better
Fund size
GFLW $1.13B
IMCG $4.04B
1Y total return
GFLW +7.7%
IMCG +14.0%, better
Yield (12M)
GFLW 0.36%
IMCG 0.67%, better
Holdings
GFLW 101
IMCG 262
Avg volume (30D)
GFLW 211K sh, better
IMCG 132K sh
NAV per share
GFLW $31.41
IMCG $93.24
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GFLW: Cost 24, Risk 37, Mission 100, Tradability 53, Holdings 69, Durability 25. IMCG: Cost 78, Risk 78, Mission 95, Tradability 61, Holdings 75, Durability 66.
Pillar letters and Scores for GFLW, IMCG, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGFLWIMCG
Cost30% weightF24A78Higher
Mission25% weightA100HigherA95
Risk15% weightD37A78Higher
Tradability15% weightC53B61Higher
Holdings10% weightB69A75Higher
Durability5% weightD25B66Higher

Rank among US Growth Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GFLW and IMCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Growth Index⁠

Category · 35 funds
See all 35 ›

IMCG ranks 2nd and GFLW 24th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.

  1. Rank 1ASPYGState Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETFScore 84
  2. Rank 2AILCGiShares Morningstar Growth ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 2AIMCGiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  4. Rank 2ASCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFScore 78
  5. Rank 24CEGUSiShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Growth ETFScore 53
  6. Rank 24CGFLWVictoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETFScore 53
  7. Rank 26CPWBInvesco Large Cap Growth ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GFLWCVictoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF

IMCGAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

In short

GFLW No data

IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.

Stated mandate

GFLW No data

IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.

Why people hold it

GFLW No data

  • IMCG 0.06% a year, one third of the 0.18% median for its growth-fund peer group. Mid-cap indexing at large-cap-index prices.
  • The growth leaderboard is stacked with large-cap funds (VUG, SCHG, SPYG, VONG). IMCG covers the middle instead, holding about 300 mid-cap growth names.
  • Sticks close to the Morningstar mid-cap growth index it follows, one of the tighter tracking jobs in its peer group.
  • Running since 2004 under the iShares roof, with a multi-billion-dollar asset base behind it.

Worth knowing

GFLW No data

  • IMCG Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than the megacap growth ETFs sitting beside it in the category.
  • This is a size-and-style bet. Mid-cap growth companies tend to move more sharply than the broad market, in both directions.
  • Distributions land quarterly, but a growth screen is not built around income.

Full GFLW profile⁠

Full IMCG profile⁠

GFLW vs IMCG Holdings

How GFLW and IMCG differ

Overlap by weight

17.7%

Shared holdings make up 28.8% of GFLW and 21.3% of IMCG.

Level by level

  • Holdings34 in both17.7%
  • Sector11 Sectors61.5%
  • Countryby domicile98.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in GFLW and IMCG, widest gap first
SectorMore in GFLWMore in IMCG
TechnologyGFLW +23.0 points
FinancialsIMCG +12.3 points
IndustrialsIMCG +11.7 points
Health CareGFLW +10.2 points
CommunicationGFLW +5.3 points
Real EstateIMCG +3.6 points
MaterialsIMCG +3.3 points
EnergyIMCG +2.5 points
UtilitiesIMCG +2.2 points
Consumer DiscretionaryIMCG +1.9 points
Consumer StaplesIMCG +1.1 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in GFLW and IMCG, widest gap first
CountryMore in GFLWMore in IMCG
United StatesGFLW +1.8 points
ChinaIMCG +0.6 points
Other countries (3)IMCG +1.3 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • GFLW27.6%
  • IMCG12.4%

Securities held

  • GFLW100
  • IMCG259

Asset class

GFLW
Equity
IMCG
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in GFLW66
  • In both34
  • Only in IMCG225

Only in GFLW

66 securities, 71.1% of GFLW by weight

  • Eli Lilly & Co4.74%
  • NVIDIA Corp.3.27%
  • Royalty Pharma PLC2.95%

Only in IMCG

225 securities, 78.6% of IMCG by weight

  • Cloudflare Class A1.35%
  • Johnson Controls International PLC1.30%
  • Freeport Mcmoran Inc1.29%

Weight gaps

All 34 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in GFLW and IMCG, widest gap first
HoldingMore in GFLWMore in IMCG
Cardinal Health IncCAHGFLW +2.48 points
Dell Technologies IncDELLGFLW +1.32 points
Incyte PharmaceuticalsINCYGFLW +1.09 points
Monster Beverage CorpMNSTGFLW +1.02 points
Comfort Systems Usa Inc.FIXGFLW +0.84 points
Snowflake IncSNOWIMCG +0.80 points
Airbnb IncABNBGFLW +0.70 points
Motorola Solutions Inc.MSIIMCG +0.68 points

All GFLW holdings⁠All 259 IMCG holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GFLW vs IMCG Cost

Overpaying GFLW vs IMCG

$6,628

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GFLW 0.39%

    $7,898

  • IMCG 0.06%

    $1,270

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GFLW 0.39%
  • IMCG 0.06%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530GFLW $7,898IMCG $1,270

Year by year

YearGFLWIMCGOverpaying
10$705$110$595
20$2,725$432$2,293
30$7,898$1,270$6,628

Expense ratio

  • 0.39%GFLW
  • 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Growth Index funds
  • Median 0.18%

IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds

GFLW 27th cheapest of 35 funds

GFLW vs IMCG Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
GFLW 0.36%
IMCG 0.67%, better
Payout (12M)
GFLW $0.11
IMCG $0.62
Last payment
GFLW $0.11
IMCG $0.19
Ex-dividend
GFLW Sep 9, 2026
IMCG Sep 15, 2026
Paid on
GFLW Sep 10, 2026
IMCG Sep 18, 2026
Frequency
GFLW Irregular
IMCG Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

GFLWIrregular · 5 paymentsAll GFLW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 5 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 12, 2024 $0.00059; Dec 26, 2024 $0.0024; Apr 10, 2025 $0.0026; Jul 10, 2025 $0.0038; Sep 9, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD
IMCGQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll IMCG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.03; Jun 27, 2017 $0.03; Sep 26, 2017 $0.05; Dec 19, 2017 $0.04; Mar 22, 2018 $0.03; Jun 26, 2018 $0.03; Sep 26, 2018 $0.02; Dec 17, 2018 $0.03; Mar 20, 2019 $0.02; Jun 17, 2019 $0.02; Sep 24, 2019 $0.02; Dec 16, 2019 $0.07; Mar 25, 2020 $0.02; Jun 15, 2020 $0.02; Sep 23, 2020 $0.01; Dec 14, 2020 $0.0067; Mar 25, 2021 $0.0083; Jun 10, 2021 $0.08; Sep 24, 2021 $0.10; Dec 13, 2021 $0.11; Mar 24, 2022 $0.10; Jun 9, 2022 $0.08; Sep 26, 2022 $0.14; Dec 13, 2022 $0.18; Mar 23, 2023 $0.12; Jun 7, 2023 $0.09; Sep 26, 2023 $0.15; Dec 20, 2023 $0.18; Mar 21, 2024 $0.13; Jun 11, 2024 $0.11; Sep 25, 2024 $0.18; Dec 17, 2024 $0.17; Mar 18, 2025 $0.12; Jun 16, 2025 $0.14; Sep 16, 2025 $0.16; Dec 16, 2025 $0.21; Mar 17, 2026 $0.12; Jun 15, 2026 $0.10; Sep 15, 2026 $0.19. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.202017202020232026YTD

GFLW vs IMCG Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GFLW 19.7%since Jan 2025IMCG 16.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GFLW 0.67since Jan 2025IMCG 0.97
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GFLW −24.1%since Dec 2024IMCG −35.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GFLW 1.25IMCG 1.14

GFLW and IMCG in the news

Popular comparisons

  • GFLWCvsSPYGA

    Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSPYGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GFLWCvsILCGA

    Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsILCGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · iShares Morningstar Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GFLWCvsSCHGA

    Victoryshares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCGAvsSCHGA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF · Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.06% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.