HYLB ranks 1st and GHYB 11th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
GHYB vs HYLB
HYLB −0.10pt a year
0.15%0.05%
HYLB 106.2×the volume
12.4K1.32M
HYLB +0.1pt
+3.5%+3.6%
GHYB vs HYLB Performance
+19.0%+19.1%
- GHYB 0.15%
- HYLB 0.05%, better
- GHYB $128M
- HYLB $3.29B
- GHYB +2.4%
- HYLB +2.7%, better
- GHYB 6.73%, better
- HYLB 6.72%
- GHYB 843
- HYLB 1286
- GHYB 12.4K sh
- HYLB 1.32M sh, better
- GHYB $43.22
- HYLB $35.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GHYB | HYLB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C53 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A86Higher |
| Durability | B55 | A76Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. GHYB and HYLB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GHYBA
HYLBA
In short
GHYB Most cheap high-yield ETFs just buy the whole junk-bond market. GHYB tracks an index Goldman co-designed with FTSE that screens the universe first, and charges well under the typical high-yield ETF.
HYLB Broad-market junk bonds at index-fund pricing: 0.05% a year, a fraction of what the typical high-yield bond ETF charges, spread across roughly 1,300 issues. Running since 2016, it pays monthly.
Stated mandate
GHYB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Citi Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds.
HYLB The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. It uses a passive representative-sampling indexing approach.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GHYB vs HYLB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GHYB vs HYLB Cost
Overpaying GHYB vs HYLB
$2,077
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GHYB 0.15%
$3,137
HYLB 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GHYB | HYLB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $92 | $182 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $360 | $711 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,060 | $2,077 |
- 0.15%GHYB
- 0.05%HYLB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
HYLB 2nd cheapest of 84 funds
GHYB 8th cheapest of 84 funds
GHYB vs HYLB Dividends
- GHYB 6.73%, better
- HYLB 6.72%
- GHYB $2.92
- HYLB $2.37
- GHYB $0.24
- HYLB $0.19
- GHYB Nov 2, 2026
- HYLB Nov 2, 2026
- GHYB Nov 6, 2026
- HYLB Nov 9, 2026
- GHYB Monthly
- HYLB Monthly
Distribution history
GHYB vs HYLB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GHYB
- HYLB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GHYB 4.7%, betterHYLB 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- GHYB 0.84, betterHYLB 0.82
- Worst fall
- GHYB −16.1%HYLB −15.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GHYB 0.66HYLB 0.66Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.