SCYB ranks 1st and GHYB 11th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
GHYB vs SCYB
SCYB −0.12pt a year
0.15%0.03%
SCYB 91.6×the volume
12.4K1.14M
GHYB +0.2pt
+8.1%+7.9%
GHYB vs SCYB Performance
+2.4%+2.6%
- GHYB 0.15%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- GHYB $128M
- SCYB $2.73B
- GHYB +2.4%
- SCYB +2.6%, better
- GHYB 6.73%
- SCYB 7.16%, better
- GHYB 843
- SCYB 1838
- GHYB 12.4K sh
- SCYB 1.14M sh, better
- GHYB $43.22
- SCYB $25.18
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GHYB | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C53 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | A81 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B55 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. GHYB and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GHYBA
SCYBA
In short
GHYB Most cheap high-yield ETFs just buy the whole junk-bond market. GHYB tracks an index Goldman co-designed with FTSE that screens the universe first, and charges well under the typical high-yield ETF.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
GHYB The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Citi Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated high-yield corporate bonds.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GHYB vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GHYB vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying GHYB vs SCYB
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GHYB 0.15%
$3,137
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GHYB | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $55 | $219 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $216 | $855 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $638 | $2,499 |
- 0.15%GHYB
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
GHYB 8th cheapest of 84 funds
GHYB vs SCYB Dividends
- GHYB 6.73%
- SCYB 7.16%, better
- GHYB $2.92
- SCYB $1.81
- GHYB $0.24
- SCYB $0.16
- GHYB Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- GHYB Nov 6, 2026
- SCYB Nov 6, 2026
- GHYB Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
GHYB vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GHYB 4.7%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GHYB 0.84, betterSCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- GHYB −16.1%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GHYB 0.66SCYB 0.28
GHYB and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
