GIGB ranks 4th and LQD 6th of 49 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate Category.
GIGB vs LQD
GIGB −0.06pt a year
0.08%0.14%
LQD 370.4×the volume
83.7K31M
GIGB +0.7pt
−0.2%−0.9%
GIGB vs LQD Performance
−0.8%−4.4%
- GIGB 0.08%, better
- LQD 0.14%
- GIGB $1.04B
- LQD $32B
- GIGB −0.5%, better
- LQD −1.8%
- GIGB 4.77%
- LQD 4.84%, better
- GIGB 2719
- LQD 3192
- GIGB 83.7K sh
- LQD 31M sh, better
- GIGB $44.25
- LQD $104.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GIGB | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A94Higher | A85 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A93 |
| Risk | C54Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | C45 | A82Higher |
| Holdings | A87 | A90Higher |
| Durability | A74 | A94Higher |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate funds
Same Category. GIGB and LQD are both graded against the same 49 Investment Grade Corporate funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIGBA
LQDA
In short
GIGB Most investment-grade corporate bond funds just buy the biggest borrowers. Goldman's index screens the market on liquidity and fundamentals first, then spreads the money across roughly 1,600 bonds for 0.08% a year.
LQD One of the first bond ETFs ever launched (2002) and still the ticker traders reach for on corporate credit. Its index takes only big, widely held investment-grade bonds, so you own the liquid end of the market.
Stated mandate
GIGB The Fund seeks to track the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index, which measures U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds meeting liquidity and fundamental screening criteria.
LQD The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GIGB vs LQD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GIGB vs LQD Cost
Overpaying LQD vs GIGB
$1,243
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GIGB 0.08%
$1,689
LQD 0.14%
$2,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GIGB | LQD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $256 | $109 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,000 | $425 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $2,932 | $1,243 |
- 0.08%GIGB, cheaper
- 0.14%LQD
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate funds
- Median 0.25%
GIGB 4th cheapest of 49 funds
LQD 8th cheapest of 49 funds
GIGB vs LQD Dividends
- GIGB 4.77%
- LQD 4.84%, better
- GIGB $2.12
- LQD $5.05
- GIGB $0.18
- LQD $0.44
- GIGB Oct 1, 2026
- LQD Oct 1, 2026
- GIGB Oct 7, 2026
- LQD Oct 6, 2026
- GIGB Monthly
- LQD Monthly
Distribution history
GIGB vs LQD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GIGB
- LQD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GIGB 6.5%, betterLQD 7.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- GIGB 0.30, betterLQD 0.26
- Worst fall
- GIGB −21.9%, betterLQD −24.5%
- Market sensitivity
- GIGB 1.04LQD 1.34
GIGB and LQD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.14% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





