GII ranks 3rd and NBET 27th of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs NBET
GII −1.70pt a year
0.40%2.10%
GII 7.3×the volume
41.6K5.7K
NBET +8.5pt
+18.4%+26.9%
GII vs NBET Performance
+11.3%+35.4%
- GII 0.40%, better
- NBET 2.10%
- GII $962M
- NBET $58M
- GII +11.3%
- NBET +35.4%, better
- GII 2.69%, better
- NBET 2.39%
- GII 89
- NBET 34
- GII 41.6K sh, better
- NBET 5.7K sh
- GII $74.56
- NBET $43.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | NBET |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | F0 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | B57 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A85Higher | B55 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and NBET are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
NBETD
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
NBET A concentrated global take on the energy transition build-out: grids, utilities, industrial materials, telecom networks and the real assets underneath them, roughly 30 names deep. A distinctive mandate carrying a premium price tag.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
NBET The Fund seeks exposure to equity securities of energy transition and infrastructure companies. Its mandate covers infrastructure assets and services across energy, utilities, industrial materials, real estate facilities, and telecommunications networks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs NBET Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs NBET Cost
Overpaying NBET vs GII
$26,031
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
NBET 2.10%
$34,121
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | NBET | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $3,537 | $2,814 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $12,665 | $9,872 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $34,121 | $26,031 |
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- 2.10%NBET
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
NBET 33rd cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs NBET Dividends
- GII 2.69%, better
- NBET 2.39%
- GII $2.02
- NBET $1.00
- GII $0.78
- NBET $0.31
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- NBET Sep 23, 2026
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- NBET Sep 28, 2026
- GII Twice a year
- NBET Quarterly
Distribution history
GII vs NBET Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%, betterNBET 18.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17NBET 1.29, better
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%NBET −18.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56NBET 0.59
GII and NBET in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.10% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.10% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.10% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

