GII ranks 3rd and WUGI 32nd of 33 funds in the Infrastructure Category.
GII vs WUGI
GII −0.44pt a year
0.40%0.84%
GII 64.6×the volume
41.6K643
GII +2.0pt
+9.7%+7.7%
GII vs WUGI Performance
+59.0%+45.0%
- GII 0.40%, better
- WUGI 0.84%
- GII $962M
- WUGI $27M
- GII +11.3%, better
- WUGI −3.8%
- GII 2.69%
- WUGI 22.66%, better
- GII 89
- WUGI 33
- GII 41.6K sh, better
- WUGI 643 sh
- GII $74.56
- WUGI $73.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GII | WUGI |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | F12 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | F19 |
| Tradability | A72Higher | F17 |
| Holdings | B68Higher | D31 |
| Durability | A85Higher | C46 |
Rank among Infrastructure funds
Same Category. GII and WUGI are both graded against the same 33 Infrastructure funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GIIA
WUGIF
In short
GII Toll roads, airports, pipelines and power grids in one ticker. GII has tracked the S&P Global Infrastructure Index since 2007, an early entrant in the category, and charges less than the typical infrastructure fund.
WUGI Most infrastructure funds buy bridges and pipelines by index. WUGI goes the other way: an active, non-diversified basket of roughly 27 global names in the 5G digital economy, run since its 2020 launch by the shop that built it.
Stated mandate
GII The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. That index provides exposure to large publicly listed infrastructure companies across transportation, utilities, and energy infrastructure.
WUGI The Fund seeks capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio focused on domestic and foreign companies connected to the 5G-enabled digital economy, including infrastructure, edge devices, and related services.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GII vs WUGI Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GII vs WUGI Cost
Overpaying WUGI vs GII
$7,939
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GII 0.40%
$8,090
WUGI 0.84%
$16,029
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GII | WUGI | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $1,491 | $768 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $5,643 | $2,850 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $16,029 | $7,939 |
- 0.40%GII, cheaper
- 0.84%WUGI
- Middle half of Infrastructure funds
- Median 0.55%
GII 6th cheapest of 33 funds
WUGI 29th cheapest of 33 funds
GII vs WUGI Dividends
- GII 2.69%
- WUGI 22.66%, better
- GII $2.02
- WUGI $16.52
- GII $0.78
- WUGI $16.52
- GII Jun 1, 2026
- WUGI Dec 23, 2025
- GII Jun 3, 2026
- WUGI Dec 26, 2025
- GII Twice a year
- WUGI Annual
Distribution history
GII vs WUGI Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GII
- WUGI
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GII 12.5%, betterWUGI 27.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GII 1.17, betterWUGI 0.99
- Worst fall
- GII −20.7%, betterWUGI −56.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GII 0.56WUGI 1.41
GII and WUGI in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.84% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.84% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.84% · 0.47%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

