RWM ranks 4th and GLL 24th of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
GLL vs RWM
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.95%0.95%
RWM 11.8×the volume
2.55M30M
RWM +9.6pt
−20.9%−11.3%
GLL vs RWM Performance
−79.2%−15.9%
- GLL 0.95%
- RWM 0.95%
- GLL $107M
- RWM $163M
- GLL −8.7%, better
- RWM −10.1%
- GLL
- RWM 3.31%
- GLL 1
- RWM 3
- GLL 2.55M sh
- RWM 30M sh, better
- GLL $27.54
- RWM $14.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLL | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D30 | B60Higher |
| Tradability | B56 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B63 | |
| Durability | B67 | B69Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. GLL and RWM are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLLC
RWMB
In short
GLL Short gold, with the volume knob turned to two. GLL aims for -2x the daily move of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex, it has been running since 2008, and it charges less than the typical leveraged-bear fund.
RWM Short small caps at one speed: RWM targets the inverse of the Russell 2000's daily move, with no 2x or 3x multiplier on top. Trading since 2007, at 0.95% net of a waiver through September 30, 2027.
Stated mandate
GLL GLL seeks daily results equal to -2 times the daily performance of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex, before fees and expenses.
RWM The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to the inverse of the Russell 2000 Index's daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLL vs RWM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLL vs RWM Cost
Same expense ratio
$17,869
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLL 0.95%
$17,869
RWM 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLL | RWM |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,678 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,322 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,869 |
- 0.95%GLL
- 0.95%RWM
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
GLL 6th cheapest of 53 funds
RWM 6th cheapest of 53 funds
GLL vs RWM Dividends
- GLL
- RWM 3.31%
- GLL None
- RWM $0.48
- GLL
- RWM $0.09
- GLL
- RWM Sep 23, 2026
- GLL
- RWM Sep 29, 2026
- GLL
- RWM Quarterly
Distribution history
GLL vs RWM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- GLL
- RWM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLL 38.2%RWM 18.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- GLL −1.10RWM −0.99, better
- Worst fall
- GLL −89.8%RWM −43.7%, better
- Market sensitivity
- GLL −0.63RWM −1.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.