UNHG ranks 2nd and GLWG 8th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GLWG vs UNHG
13.5%by weight
GLWG −0.02pt a year
0.75%0.77%
GLWG 2.0×the volume
1.45M726K
GLWG vs UNHG Performance
−31.9%−11.0%
- GLWG 0.75%, better
- UNHG 0.77%
- GLWG $76M
- UNHG $63M
- GLWG
- UNHG +8.4%
- GLWG 4
- UNHG 5
- GLWG 1.45M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- GLWG $8.09
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLWG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A84 | A90Higher |
| Risk | C51 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A86 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | B66Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GLWG and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLWGB
UNHGA
In short
GLWG Two times Corning's daily move, in a wrapper that can't margin-call you. GLWG aims for 200% of GLW's daily return, pointing leverage at the fiber-and-glass supplier behind data centers rather than the usual megacap chip name.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
GLWG The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of GLW.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLWG vs UNHG Holdings
How GLWG and UNHG differ
13.5%
Shared holdings make up 19.0% of GLWG and 13.5% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings13.5%
Sector
No Sector split for GLWG and UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GLWGMore in UNHG | GLWG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- GLWG219.1%
- UNHG213.5%
- GLWG1
- UNHG1
Asset class
- GLWG
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GLWG0
- In both1
- Only in UNHG0
Only in GLWG
0 securities, 0.0% of GLWG by weight
Only in UNHG
0 securities, 0.0% of UNHG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in GLWGMore in UNHG | GLWG | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | GLWG +5.56 points | 19.03% | 13.47% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLWG vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying UNHG vs GLWG
$347
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLWG 0.75%
$14,482
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLWG | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,371 | $35 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,205 | $127 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,829 | $347 |
- 0.75%GLWG, cheaper
- 0.77%UNHG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GLWG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
GLWG vs UNHG Dividends
- GLWG None
- UNHG
- GLWG
- UNHG $1.90
- GLWG
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- GLWG
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- GLWG
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
GLWG vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLWG UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLWG UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- GLWG UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- GLWG 2.54UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.