PANG ranks 3rd and GLWG 8th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GLWG vs PANG
GLWG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
GLWG 32.4×the volume
1.45M44.6K
GLWG vs PANG Performance
−31.9%−1.5%
- GLWG 0.75%, better
- PANG 0.76%
- GLWG $76M
- PANG $9M
- GLWG
- PANG +76.3%
- GLWG 4
- PANG 4
- GLWG 1.45M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- GLWG $8.09
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLWG | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A84 | A94Higher |
| Risk | C51 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A86Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GLWG and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLWGB
PANGA
In short
GLWG Two times Corning's daily move, in a wrapper that can't margin-call you. GLWG aims for 200% of GLW's daily return, pointing leverage at the fiber-and-glass supplier behind data centers rather than the usual megacap chip name.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
GLWG The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of GLW.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLWG vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLWG vs PANG Cost
Overpaying PANG vs GLWG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLWG 0.75%
$14,482
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLWG | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%GLWG, cheaper
- 0.76%PANG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GLWG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
GLWG vs PANG Dividends
- GLWG None
- PANG
- GLWG
- PANG $1.30
- GLWG
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- GLWG
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- GLWG
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
GLWG vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLWG PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLWG PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- GLWG PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- GLWG 2.54PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.