TSMG ranks 1st and GLWG 8th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GLWG vs TSMG
14.6%by weight
GLWG −0.01pt a year
0.75%0.76%
GLWG 21.0×the volume
1.45M69K
GLWG vs TSMG Performance
−31.9%−7.6%
- GLWG 0.75%, better
- TSMG 0.76%
- GLWG $76M
- TSMG $28M
- GLWG
- TSMG +36.4%
- GLWG 4
- TSMG 5
- GLWG 1.45M sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- GLWG $8.09
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GLWG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70 | A70 |
| Mission | A84Higher | A79 |
| Risk | C51 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | A86Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GLWG and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GLWGB
TSMGA
In short
GLWG Two times Corning's daily move, in a wrapper that can't margin-call you. GLWG aims for 200% of GLW's daily return, pointing leverage at the fiber-and-glass supplier behind data centers rather than the usual megacap chip name.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
GLWG The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of GLW.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GLWG vs TSMG Holdings
How GLWG and TSMG differ
14.6%
Shared holdings make up 19.0% of GLWG and 14.6% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Holdings14.6%
Sector
No Sector split for GLWG and TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in GLWGMore in TSMG | GLWG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- GLWG219.1%
- TSMG214.6%
- GLWG1
- TSMG1
Asset class
- GLWG
- Equity
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GLWG0
- In both1
- Only in TSMG0
Only in GLWG
0 securities, 0.0% of GLWG by weight
Only in TSMG
0 securities, 0.0% of TSMG by weight
Weight gaps
All 1 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in GLWGMore in TSMG | GLWG | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/2040 | GLWG +4.44 points | 19.03% | 14.59% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GLWG vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying TSMG vs GLWG
$174
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GLWG 0.75%
$14,482
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GLWG | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $1,353 | $17 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $5,142 | $64 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $14,656 | $174 |
- 0.75%GLWG, cheaper
- 0.76%TSMG
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GLWG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
GLWG vs TSMG Dividends
- GLWG None
- TSMG
- GLWG
- TSMG $2.73
- GLWG
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- GLWG
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- GLWG
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
GLWG vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GLWG TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- GLWG TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- GLWG TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GLWG 2.54TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.