PSMR ranks 3rd and GMAR 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GMAR vs PSMR
PSMR −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GMAR 27.5×the volume
29.8K1.08K
GMAR +0.2pt
+12.1%+11.9%
GMAR vs PSMR Performance
+12.5%+12.5%
- GMAR 0.85%
- PSMR 0.49%, better
- GMAR $421M
- PSMR $90M
- GMAR +12.5%
- PSMR +12.5%
- GMAR 3
- PSMR 3
- GMAR 29.8K sh, better
- PSMR 1.08K sh
- GMAR $44.92
- PSMR $32.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMAR | PSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A76Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | B57Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | A75Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GMAR and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMARC
PSMRB
In short
GMAR A March-dated buffer fund: it absorbs the first 15% of an SPY price drop over each one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap First Trust resets every March.
PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.
Stated mandate
GMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 14.10% cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.
PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMAR vs PSMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMAR vs PSMR Cost
Overpaying GMAR vs PSMR
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMAR 0.85%
$16,199
PSMR 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMAR | PSMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GMAR
- 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GMAR 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GMAR vs PSMR Dividends
- GMAR None
- PSMR None
Distribution history
GMAR vs PSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMAR 4.8%, betterPSMR 6.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMAR 1.64, betterPSMR 1.31
- Worst fall
- GMAR −9.1%PSMR −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- GMAR 0.34PSMR 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.