Skip to content

GMAR vs PSMR

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March

GMARCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

PSMRBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMR −0.36pt a year

GMAR0.85%PSMR0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GMAR 27.5×the volume

GMAR29.8KPSMR1.08K

3Y return · a year

GMAR +0.2pt

GMAR+12.1%PSMR+11.9%

GMAR vs PSMR Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+12.5%GMAR+12.5%PSMR

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GMAR +12.5%. PSMR +12.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%7.5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GMAR 0.85%
PSMR 0.49%, better
Fund size
GMAR $421M
PSMR $90M
1Y total return
GMAR +12.5%
PSMR +12.5%
Holdings
GMAR 3
PSMR 3
Avg volume (30D)
GMAR 29.8K sh, better
PSMR 1.08K sh
NAV per share
GMAR $44.92
PSMR $32.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMAR: Cost 13, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings 59, Durability 75. PSMR: Cost 70, Risk 56, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMAR, PSMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMARPSMR
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherB56
Tradability15% weightB57HigherD32
Holdings10% weightB59Not scored
Durability5% weightA75HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMAR and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMR ranks 3rd and GMAR 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 56
  5. Rank 20CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 44
  6. Rank 20CGMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - MarchScore 44
  7. Rank 20CGNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMARCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March

PSMRBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

In short

GMAR A March-dated buffer fund: it absorbs the first 15% of an SPY price drop over each one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap First Trust resets every March.

PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.

Stated mandate

GMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 14.10% cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.

PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GMAR The cushion is 15%, one of the deeper standard buffers out there: the fund is built to eat the first 15% of the reference ETF's price decline over the outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • March is just one door. Twelve siblings (GJAN through GDEC) run the same 15% recipe on different start months, so entry dates can be laddered rather than guessed.ftportfolios.com
  • The rules are printed before you commit: buffer size, reference asset (SPY price return) and the exact outcome start and end dates all come from First Trust's own documents.ftportfolios.com
  • PSMR Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median in its buffered-SPY cohort, and undercuts Pacer's own single-month siblings like PJUL and POCT at 0.79%.
  • The contract is spelled out: a 15-point buffer against SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over roughly a one-year period, with upside capped at a level set when the period begins.paceretfs.com
  • Terms reset on April 1 each year, so the new buffer and cap arrive on a known calendar date instead of whenever you happened to buy in.paceretfs.com
  • Running since 2021, so this April series has cycled through several complete outcome periods rather than being a fresh launch with a paper track record.

Worth knowing

  • GMAR The 0.85% fee runs above the middle of the buffer peer group, and a laddered alternative like BUFF charges 0.10% for a broadly similar job.
  • It tracks SPY's price return, so dividends sit outside the deal, and there are no fund distributions either. Buy or sell mid-period and you get only part of the buffer and cap.
  • Volume is thin next to the headline buffer funds, so the bid-ask spread is worth a look before trading.
  • PSMR Thinly traded next to the biggest names in buffer land, so spreads and order size are worth a look before you place a trade.
  • The cap cuts both ways: big SPY years get trimmed, and the stated buffer and cap only line up in full for a holder who rides one April reset to the next.
  • Not an income vehicle. It has not been paying a regular distribution, so whatever the strategy delivers shows up in the share price.

Full GMAR profile⁠

Full PSMR profile⁠

GMAR vs PSMR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMAR vs PSMR Cost

Overpaying GMAR vs PSMR

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMR 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMAR 0.85%
  • PSMR 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GMAR $16,199PSMR $9,792

Year by year

YearGMARPSMROverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GMAR
  • 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GMAR 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GMAR vs PSMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Payout (12M)
GMAR None
PSMR None

Distribution history

GMARAll GMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMRAll PSMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

GMAR vs PSMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMAR 4.8%, betterPSMR 6.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMAR 1.64, betterPSMR 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMAR −9.1%since Mar 2023PSMR −11.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMAR 0.34PSMR 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • GMARCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMARCvsPSMJB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMARCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.