PSMJ ranks 2nd and GMAR 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
GMAR vs PSMJ
PSMJ −0.36pt a year
0.85%0.49%
GMAR 5.0×the volume
29.8K5.98K
PSMJ +1.5pt
+12.1%+13.6%
GMAR vs PSMJ Performance
+12.5%+8.5%
- GMAR 0.85%
- PSMJ 0.49%, better
- GMAR $421M
- PSMJ $106M
- GMAR +12.5%, better
- PSMJ +8.5%
- GMAR
- PSMJ 0.00%
- GMAR 3
- PSMJ 3
- GMAR 29.8K sh, better
- PSMJ 5.98K sh
- GMAR $44.92
- PSMJ $33.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMAR | PSMJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F13 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A76Higher | C53 |
| Tradability | B57Higher | C48 |
| Holdings | B59 | |
| Durability | A75Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. GMAR and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMARC
PSMJB
In short
GMAR A March-dated buffer fund: it absorbs the first 15% of an SPY price drop over each one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap First Trust resets every March.
PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.
Stated mandate
GMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 14.10% cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.
PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMAR vs PSMJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMAR vs PSMJ Cost
Overpaying GMAR vs PSMJ
$6,407
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMAR 0.85%
$16,199
PSMJ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMAR | PSMJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $883 | $625 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $3,394 | $2,312 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $9,792 | $6,407 |
- 0.85%GMAR
- 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds
GMAR 37th cheapest of 51 funds
GMAR vs PSMJ Dividends
- GMAR
- PSMJ 0.00%
- GMAR None
- PSMJ None
Distribution history
GMAR vs PSMJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMAR 4.8%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMAR 1.64, betterPSMJ 1.47
- Worst fall
- GMAR −9.1%PSMJ −10.9%
- Market sensitivity
- GMAR 0.34PSMJ 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.