Skip to content

GMAR vs PSMJ

FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March

GMARCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

PSMJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMJ −0.36pt a year

GMAR0.85%PSMJ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

GMAR 5.0×the volume

GMAR29.8KPSMJ5.98K

3Y return · a year

PSMJ +1.5pt

GMAR+12.1%PSMJ+13.6%

GMAR vs PSMJ Performance

Nov 7, 2025 – Nov 9, 2026

+12.5%GMAR+8.5%PSMJ

Nov 7, 2025 to Nov 9, 2026. GMAR +12.5%. PSMJ +8.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
GMAR 0.85%
PSMJ 0.49%, better
Fund size
GMAR $421M
PSMJ $106M
1Y total return
GMAR +12.5%, better
PSMJ +8.5%
Yield (12M)
GMAR No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Holdings
GMAR 3
PSMJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
GMAR 29.8K sh, better
PSMJ 5.98K sh
NAV per share
GMAR $44.92
PSMJ $33.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

GMAR: Cost 13, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings 59, Durability 75. PSMJ: Cost 70, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for GMAR, PSMJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarGMARPSMJ
Cost30% weightF13A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA76HigherC53
Tradability15% weightB57HigherC48
Holdings10% weightB59Not scored
Durability5% weightA75HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. GMAR and PSMJ are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMJ ranks 2nd and GMAR 20th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 63
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 60
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 20CGJUNFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - JuneScore 44
  5. Rank 20CGMARFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - MarchScore 44
  6. Rank 20CGNOVFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

GMARCFT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March

PSMJBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

In short

GMAR A March-dated buffer fund: it absorbs the first 15% of an SPY price drop over each one-year outcome period, and in exchange your upside stops at a cap First Trust resets every March.

PSMJ Pacer's July-dated stop on the Swan SOS ladder: FLEX options on SPY that buffer the first 15% of a fall over a roughly one-year period, with upside capped in return. At 0.49%, it undercuts most of the buffer aisle.

Stated mandate

GMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust up to a 14.10% cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the specified outcome period.

PSMJ The Fund seeks to track the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • GMAR The cushion is 15%, one of the deeper standard buffers out there: the fund is built to eat the first 15% of the reference ETF's price decline over the outcome period.ftportfolios.com
  • March is just one door. Twelve siblings (GJAN through GDEC) run the same 15% recipe on different start months, so entry dates can be laddered rather than guessed.ftportfolios.com
  • The rules are printed before you commit: buffer size, reference asset (SPY price return) and the exact outcome start and end dates all come from First Trust's own documents.ftportfolios.com
  • PSMJ Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median for its buffered-SPY cohort, the same 0.79% Innovator's Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) charge for a similar job.
  • The deal is legible: FLEX options on SPY absorb the first 15% of a decline over the outcome period, and match the ETF's gains up to a cap struck each July.paceretfs.compaceretfs.com 2
  • Those FLEX options are customizable exchange-traded contracts settled through the Options Clearing Corporation, and Durango-based Swan Global Management sub-advises the strategy.paceretfs.com
  • One of four Moderate-series funds with staggered start months (PSMD, PSMR, PSMJ, PSMO), so a July reset can be stacked against other entry points rather than standing alone.paceretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • GMAR The 0.85% fee runs above the middle of the buffer peer group, and a laddered alternative like BUFF charges 0.10% for a broadly similar job.
  • It tracks SPY's price return, so dividends sit outside the deal, and there are no fund distributions either. Buy or sell mid-period and you get only part of the buffer and cap.
  • Volume is thin next to the headline buffer funds, so the bid-ask spread is worth a look before trading.
  • PSMJ The 15% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Step in mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer remain, not the starting terms.paceretfs.com
  • Thinly traded next to the largest buffer funds, so spreads and limit orders deserve more of your attention at the point of entry.
  • No regular income stream here: the options structure delivers its result through share price rather than distributions.paceretfs.com

Full GMAR profile⁠

Full PSMJ profile⁠

GMAR vs PSMJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

GMAR vs PSMJ Cost

Overpaying GMAR vs PSMJ

$6,407

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • GMAR 0.85%

    $16,199

  • PSMJ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • GMAR 0.85%
  • PSMJ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530GMAR $16,199PSMJ $9,792

Year by year

YearGMARPSMJOverpaying
10$1,508$883$625
20$5,706$3,394$2,312
30$16,199$9,792$6,407

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%GMAR
  • 0.49%PSMJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMJ 5th cheapest of 51 funds

GMAR 37th cheapest of 51 funds

GMAR vs PSMJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 9, 2026
Yield (12M)
GMAR No data
PSMJ 0.00%
Payout (12M)
GMAR None
PSMJ None

Distribution history

Per share, 2021, same scale for both

GMARAll GMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMJ1 paymentAll PSMJ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2021. Dec 23, 2021 $0.0038. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.00252021

GMAR vs PSMJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
GMAR 4.8%, betterPSMJ 6.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
GMAR 1.64, betterPSMJ 1.47
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
GMAR −9.1%since Mar 2023PSMJ −10.9%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
GMAR 0.34PSMJ 0.47

Popular comparisons

  • GMARCvsPSMOB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMARCvsPSMRB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsPSMRB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GMARCvsBUFCB

    FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMJBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.