XHLF ranks 4th and GMOC 46th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
GMOC vs XHLF
XHLF −0.17pt a year
0.20%0.03%
XHLF 50.5×the volume
6.12K309K
GMOC vs XHLF Performance
+4.2%+3.6%
- GMOC 0.20%
- XHLF 0.03%, better
- GMOC $30M
- XHLF $2.03B
- GMOC +4.2%, better
- XHLF +3.6%
- GMOC
- XHLF 3.75%
- GMOC 49
- XHLF 29
- GMOC 6.12K sh
- XHLF 309K sh, better
- GMOC $50.07
- XHLF $50.29
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GMOC | XHLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B66Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | D33 | A79Higher |
| Holdings | C40Higher | D35 |
| Durability | D36 | B59Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. GMOC and XHLF are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GMOCB
XHLFA
In short
GMOC GMO's answer to the cash-parking corner: an actively managed ultra-short fund that reaches into CLOs and repo alongside Treasuries, not just T-bills. Launched late 2025 at a 0.20% fee.
XHLF Most cash-parking funds pick a maturity bucket. XHLF picks a number: it blends Treasury bills to an average duration of about six months, resets to that target monthly, and charges three basis points to do it.
Stated mandate
GMOC The Fund seeks current income while preserving capital. It is actively managed and invests primarily in low-duration, high-quality fixed-income securities, including CLOs, U.S. Treasuries, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, and other investment-grade instruments.
XHLF The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. Treasury securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GMOC vs XHLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GMOC vs XHLF Cost
Overpaying GMOC vs XHLF
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GMOC 0.20%
$4,155
XHLF 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GMOC | XHLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $55 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $216 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $638 | $3,517 |
- 0.20%GMOC
- 0.03%XHLF, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
XHLF cheapest of 78 funds
GMOC 45th cheapest of 78 funds
GMOC vs XHLF Dividends
- GMOC
- XHLF 3.75%
- GMOC
- XHLF $1.89
- GMOC $0.18
- XHLF $0.15
- GMOC Oct 30, 2026
- XHLF Oct 1, 2026
- GMOC Pays Nov 2, 2026
- XHLF Oct 6, 2026
- GMOC Monthly
- XHLF Monthly
Distribution history
GMOC vs XHLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GMOC 0.2%XHLF 0.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GMOC 1.88XHLF −0.52
- Worst fall
- GMOC −0.1%XHLF −0.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- GMOC 0.02XHLF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.