GNR ranks 2nd and NRES 8th of 14 funds in the Natural Resources Category.
GNR vs NRES
GNR −0.05pt a year
0.40%0.45%
GNR 492.7×the volume
341K692
GNR vs NRES Performance
+31.9%+26.3%
- GNR 0.40%, better
- NRES 0.45%
- GNR $5.39B
- NRES $35M
- GNR +31.9%, better
- NRES +26.3%
- GNR 2.42%, better
- NRES 2.16%
- GNR 110
- NRES 56
- GNR 341K sh, better
- NRES 692 sh
- GNR $75.69
- NRES $33.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GNR | NRES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | C50 |
| Mission | A76Higher | A72 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A83Higher | F19 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | B59 |
| Durability | A89Higher | C42 |
Rank among Natural Resources funds
Same Category. GNR and NRES are both graded against the same 14 Natural Resources funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GNRA
NRESC
In short
GNR Most resource ETFs are energy funds in a hard hat. GNR spreads a global, large-cap lineup across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining, roughly 90 names tracking an S&P natural resources index since 2010.
NRES DWS's first US active ETF, and it swings at the unglamorous stuff: a global, go-anywhere basket of miners, drillers, growers and forestry names hand-picked by the firm's real assets desk, priced at 0.45% a year.
Stated mandate
GNR The fund seeks to provide investment results corresponding generally to the total return performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. It provides exposure to large-cap companies across agriculture, energy, and metals and mining.
NRES The fund seeks total return through capital appreciation and current income. It is actively managed and does not seek to replicate a specific index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GNR vs NRES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GNR vs NRES Cost
Overpaying NRES vs GNR
$951
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GNR 0.40%
$8,090
NRES 0.45%
$9,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GNR | NRES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $812 | $89 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $3,128 | $335 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $9,041 | $951 |
- 0.40%GNR, cheaper
- 0.45%NRES
- Middle half of Natural Resources funds
- Median 0.46%
GNR 4th cheapest of 14 funds
NRES 7th cheapest of 14 funds
GNR vs NRES Dividends
- GNR 2.42%, better
- NRES 2.16%
- GNR $1.82
- NRES $0.73
- GNR $0.86
- NRES $0.11
- GNR Jun 1, 2026
- NRES Sep 18, 2026
- GNR Jun 3, 2026
- NRES Sep 25, 2026
- GNR Twice a year
- NRES Quarterly
Distribution history
GNR vs NRES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GNR 15.9%NRES 17.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- GNR 0.75NRES 0.64
- Worst fall
- GNR −25.7%NRES −22.2%
- Market sensitivity
- GNR 0.48NRES 0.23
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.41%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.