MRVU ranks 54th and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GOGL vs MRVU
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.77pt a year
0.20%0.97%
MRVU 9.9×the volume
18.9K187K
GOGL vs MRVU Performance
−42.4%−32.1%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- MRVU 0.97%
- GOGL $4M
- MRVU $66M
- GOGL 1
- MRVU 11
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- MRVU 187K sh, better
- GOGL $15.14
- MRVU $75.04
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOGL | MRVU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C54 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | C45 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D36 | A71Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GOGL and MRVU are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOGLC
MRVUB
In short
MRVU 2x Marvell's daily move in a single ticker, from the house that built the daily leveraged ETF playbook. The fee runs 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027, undercutting the rival 2x Marvell fund.
Stated mandate
MRVU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Marvell Technology, Inc.'s common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOGL vs MRVU Holdings
How GOGL and MRVU differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GOGL and 0.0% of MRVU.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GOGL and MRVU.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- GOGL199.3%
- MRVU99.8%
- GOGL0
- MRVU3
Asset class
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- MRVU
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GOGL0
- In both0
- Only in MRVU3
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Only in MRVU
3 securities, 18.6% of MRVU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50616.54%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut1.71%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.33%
Weight gaps
GOGL and MRVU share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOGL vs MRVU Cost
Overpaying MRVU vs GOGL
$14,043
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
MRVU 0.97%
$18,198
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOGL | MRVU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,712 | $1,347 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $6,443 | $5,022 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $18,198 | $14,043 |
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- 0.97%MRVU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
MRVU 156th cheapest of 315 funds
GOGL vs MRVU Dividends
- GOGL None
- MRVU
- GOGL
- MRVU $0.38
- GOGL
- MRVU Sep 22, 2026
- GOGL
- MRVU Sep 29, 2026
- GOGL
- MRVU Quarterly
Distribution history
GOGL vs MRVU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- GOGL −3.37MRVU 8.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.