OKTG ranks 3rd and MRVU 54th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MRVU vs OKTG
0.0%by weight
OKTG −0.22pt a year
0.97%0.75%
MRVU 4.9×the volume
187K38.5K
MRVU vs OKTG Performance
−32.1%+39.8%
- MRVU 0.97%
- OKTG 0.75%, better
- MRVU $66M
- OKTG $8M
- MRVU 11
- OKTG 6
- MRVU 187K sh, better
- OKTG 38.5K sh
- MRVU $75.04
- OKTG $53.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MRVU | OKTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A95Higher | A94 |
| Risk | B59 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | B61 | A73Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A71Higher | C51 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MRVU and OKTG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MRVUB
OKTGA
In short
MRVU 2x Marvell's daily move in a single ticker, from the house that built the daily leveraged ETF playbook. The fee runs 0.97% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027, undercutting the rival 2x Marvell fund.
OKTG A 2x daily amplifier on Okta, the identity-security stock, in an ETF wrapper. Leverage Shares prices it at 0.75%, under the typical leveraged single-stock fund, in a corner of the market built mostly around mega-caps.
Stated mandate
MRVU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Marvell Technology, Inc.'s common shares.
OKTG The fund seeks daily leveraged investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of the publicly traded common stock identified as OKTA, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MRVU vs OKTG Holdings
How MRVU and OKTG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of MRVU and 0.0% of OKTG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for MRVU and OKTG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in MRVUMore in OKTG | MRVU | OKTG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- MRVU99.8%
- OKTG207.4%
- MRVU3
- OKTG1
Asset class
- MRVU
- Equity
- OKTG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in MRVU3
- In both0
- Only in OKTG1
Only in MRVU
3 securities, 18.6% of MRVU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50616.54%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut1.71%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.33%
Only in OKTG
1 security, 7.4% of OKTG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20407.35%
Weight gaps
MRVU and OKTG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MRVU vs OKTG Cost
Overpaying MRVU vs OKTG
$3,716
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MRVU 0.97%
$18,198
OKTG 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MRVU | OKTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,712 | $1,336 | $376 |
| 20 | $6,443 | $5,078 | $1,365 |
| 30 | $18,198 | $14,482 | $3,716 |
- 0.97%MRVU
- 0.75%OKTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
OKTG 87th cheapest of 315 funds
MRVU 156th cheapest of 315 funds
MRVU vs OKTG Dividends
- MRVU
- OKTG None
- MRVU $0.38
- OKTG
- MRVU Sep 22, 2026
- OKTG
- MRVU Sep 29, 2026
- OKTG
- MRVU Quarterly
- OKTG
Distribution history
MRVU vs OKTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Market sensitivity
- MRVU 8.08OKTG 2.39
Popular comparisons
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.97% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.