MSFU ranks 29th and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GOGL vs MSFU
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.78pt a year
0.20%0.98%
MSFU 282.5×the volume
18.9K5.35M
GOGL vs MSFU Performance
−41.9%+22.2%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- MSFU 0.98%
- GOGL $4M
- MSFU $416M
- GOGL
- MSFU −15.3%
- GOGL
- MSFU 7.81%
- GOGL 1
- MSFU 7
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- MSFU 5.35M sh, better
- GOGL $15.14
- MSFU $41.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOGL | MSFU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C54 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | C45 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D37 | A87Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GOGL and MSFU are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOGLC
MSFUB
In short
MSFU A day-trading dial on Microsoft: MSFU targets 200% of MSFT's daily move, then resets every night. It launched as a 1.5x fund and was re-geared to a full 2x in April 2024, so today's version is the more aggressive one.
Stated mandate
MSFU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Microsoft Corporation common shares.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOGL vs MSFU Holdings
How GOGL and MSFU differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GOGL and 0.0% of MSFU.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- GOGL199.4%
- MSFU100.0%
- GOGL0
- MSFU3
Asset class
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- MSFU
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GOGL0
- In both0
- Only in MSFU3
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Only in MSFU
3 securities, 30.7% of MSFU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50618.63%
- Microsoft Corp9.53%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut2.51%
Weight gaps
GOGL and MSFU share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOGL vs MSFU Cost
Overpaying MSFU vs GOGL
$14,207
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
MSFU 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOGL | MSFU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,729 | $1,364 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $6,504 | $5,083 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $18,362 | $14,207 |
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- 0.98%MSFU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
MSFU 168th cheapest of 315 funds
GOGL vs MSFU Dividends
- GOGL
- MSFU 7.81%
- GOGL None
- MSFU $3.14
- GOGL
- MSFU $0.30
- GOGL
- MSFU Sep 22, 2026
- GOGL
- MSFU Sep 29, 2026
- GOGL
- MSFU Quarterly
Distribution history
GOGL vs MSFU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GOGL MSFU 56.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- GOGL MSFU 0.38
- Worst fall
- GOGL MSFU −62.3%
- Market sensitivity
- GOGL −3.37MSFU 1.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.