PANG ranks 3rd and MSFU 29th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MSFU vs PANG
PANG −0.22pt a year
0.98%0.76%
MSFU 119.9×the volume
5.35M44.6K
MSFU vs PANG Performance
−15.3%+91.6%
- MSFU 0.98%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- MSFU $416M
- PANG $9M
- MSFU −15.3%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- MSFU 7.81%
- PANG
- MSFU 7
- PANG 4
- MSFU 5.35M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- MSFU $41.59
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSFU | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A94Higher |
| Risk | B61 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A70 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A87Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MSFU and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSFUB
PANGA
In short
MSFU A day-trading dial on Microsoft: MSFU targets 200% of MSFT's daily move, then resets every night. It launched as a 1.5x fund and was re-geared to a full 2x in April 2024, so today's version is the more aggressive one.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
MSFU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Microsoft Corporation common shares.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSFU vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSFU vs PANG Cost
Overpaying MSFU vs PANG
$3,706
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSFU 0.98%
$18,362
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSFU | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,353 | $376 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $5,142 | $1,362 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $14,656 | $3,706 |
- 0.98%MSFU
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
MSFU 168th cheapest of 315 funds
MSFU vs PANG Dividends
- MSFU 7.81%
- PANG
- MSFU $3.14
- PANG
- MSFU $0.30
- PANG $1.30
- MSFU Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- MSFU Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- MSFU Quarterly
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
MSFU vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSFU 56.3%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSFU 0.38PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MSFU −62.3%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- MSFU 1.84PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.