UNHG ranks 2nd and MSFU 29th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
MSFU vs UNHG
UNHG −0.21pt a year
0.98%0.77%
MSFU 7.4×the volume
5.35M726K
MSFU vs UNHG Performance
−15.3%+11.9%
- MSFU 0.98%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- MSFU $416M
- UNHG $63M
- MSFU −15.3%
- UNHG +11.9%, better
- MSFU 7.81%
- UNHG
- MSFU 7
- UNHG 5
- MSFU 5.35M sh, better
- UNHG 726K sh
- MSFU $41.59
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MSFU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C54 | B60Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A90Higher |
| Risk | B61 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | A70 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A87Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. MSFU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MSFUB
UNHGA
In short
MSFU A day-trading dial on Microsoft: MSFU targets 200% of MSFT's daily move, then resets every night. It launched as a 1.5x fund and was re-geared to a full 2x in April 2024, so today's version is the more aggressive one.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
MSFU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of Microsoft Corporation common shares.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MSFU vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MSFU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying MSFU vs UNHG
$3,533
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MSFU 0.98%
$18,362
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MSFU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $1,371 | $358 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $5,205 | $1,299 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $14,829 | $3,533 |
- 0.98%MSFU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
MSFU 168th cheapest of 315 funds
MSFU vs UNHG Dividends
- MSFU 7.81%
- UNHG
- MSFU $3.14
- UNHG
- MSFU $0.30
- UNHG $1.90
- MSFU Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- MSFU Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- MSFU Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
MSFU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MSFU 56.3%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- MSFU 0.38UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- MSFU −62.3%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MSFU 1.84UNHG 5.53
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.