QCMU ranks 78th and GOGL 123rd of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
GOGL vs QCMU
0.0%by weight
GOGL −0.87pt a year
0.20%1.07%
QCMU 7.2×the volume
18.9K137K
GOGL vs QCMU Performance
−42.4%+10.9%
- GOGL 0.20%, better
- QCMU 1.07%
- GOGL $4M
- QCMU $19M
- GOGL
- QCMU −44.8%
- GOGL
- QCMU 3.52%
- GOGL 1
- QCMU 7
- GOGL 18.9K sh
- QCMU 137K sh, better
- GOGL $15.14
- QCMU $17.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | GOGL | QCMU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C40 |
| Mission | B67 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | C45 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D36 | A73Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. GOGL and QCMU are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
GOGLC
QCMUC
In short
QCMU Qualcomm's daily move, doubled. Direxion packages 200% daily exposure to QCOM through swaps, with a matching bear fund for the other side of the trade. The leverage resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon tool by design.
Stated mandate
QCMU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of QUALCOMM Incorporated common shares before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
GOGL vs QCMU Holdings
How GOGL and QCMU differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of GOGL and 0.0% of QCMU.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for GOGL.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
No country split for GOGL.
Concentration
- GOGL199.3%
- QCMU100.0%
- GOGL0
- QCMU2
Asset class
- GOGL
- Leveraged/Inverse
- QCMU
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in GOGL0
- In both0
- Only in QCMU2
Only in GOGL
0 securities, 0.0% of GOGL by weight
Only in QCMU
2 securities, 24.0% of QCMU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50615.16%
- Qualcomm Inc8.80%
Weight gaps
GOGL and QCMU share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
GOGL vs QCMU Cost
Overpaying QCMU vs GOGL
$15,660
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
GOGL 0.20%
$4,155
QCMU 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | GOGL | QCMU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $1,881 | $1,516 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $7,046 | $5,625 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $19,815 | $15,660 |
- 0.20%GOGL, cheaper
- 1.07%QCMU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
GOGL cheapest of 315 funds
QCMU 213th cheapest of 315 funds
GOGL vs QCMU Dividends
- GOGL
- QCMU 3.52%
- GOGL None
- QCMU $0.59
- GOGL
- QCMU $0.14
- GOGL
- QCMU Sep 22, 2026
- GOGL
- QCMU Sep 29, 2026
- GOGL
- QCMU Quarterly
Distribution history
GOGL vs QCMU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- GOGL QCMU 131.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- GOGL QCMU 0.30
- Worst fall
- GOGL QCMU −68.7%
- Market sensitivity
- GOGL −3.37QCMU 8.91
GOGL and QCMU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
