UNHG ranks 2nd and QCMU 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
QCMU vs UNHG
0.0%by weight
UNHG −0.30pt a year
1.07%0.77%
UNHG 5.3×the volume
137K726K
QCMU vs UNHG Performance
−44.8%+8.4%
- QCMU 1.07%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- QCMU $19M
- UNHG $63M
- QCMU −44.8%
- UNHG +8.4%, better
- QCMU 3.52%
- UNHG
- QCMU 7
- UNHG 5
- QCMU 137K sh
- UNHG 726K sh, better
- QCMU $17.51
- UNHG $20.57
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QCMU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | B60Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A90Higher |
| Risk | B63 | A83Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A73Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. QCMU and UNHG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QCMUC
UNHGA
In short
QCMU Qualcomm's daily move, doubled. Direxion packages 200% daily exposure to QCOM through swaps, with a matching bear fund for the other side of the trade. The leverage resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon tool by design.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
QCMU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of QUALCOMM Incorporated common shares before fees and expenses.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QCMU vs UNHG Holdings
How QCMU and UNHG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QCMU and 0.0% of UNHG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for UNHG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QCMUMore in UNHG | QCMU | UNHG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- QCMU100.0%
- UNHG213.5%
- QCMU2
- UNHG1
Asset class
- QCMU
- Equity
- UNHG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in QCMU2
- In both0
- Only in UNHG1
Only in QCMU
2 securities, 24.0% of QCMU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50615.16%
- Qualcomm Inc8.80%
Only in UNHG
1 security, 13.5% of UNHG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204013.47%
Weight gaps
QCMU and UNHG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QCMU vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying QCMU vs UNHG
$4,986
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QCMU 1.07%
$19,815
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QCMU | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,371 | $510 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $5,205 | $1,841 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $14,829 | $4,986 |
- 1.07%QCMU
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 315 funds
QCMU 213th cheapest of 315 funds
QCMU vs UNHG Dividends
- QCMU 3.52%
- UNHG
- QCMU $0.59
- UNHG
- QCMU $0.14
- UNHG $1.90
- QCMU Sep 22, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- QCMU Sep 29, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- QCMU Quarterly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
QCMU vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QCMU 131.0%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- QCMU 0.30UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- QCMU −68.7%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- QCMU 8.91UNHG 5.19
QCMU and UNHG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
