TSMG ranks 1st and QCMU 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
QCMU vs TSMG
0.0%by weight
TSMG −0.31pt a year
1.07%0.76%
QCMU 2.0×the volume
137K69K
QCMU vs TSMG Performance
−44.8%+36.4%
- QCMU 1.07%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- QCMU $19M
- TSMG $28M
- QCMU −44.8%
- TSMG +36.4%, better
- QCMU 3.52%
- TSMG
- QCMU 7
- TSMG 5
- QCMU 137K sh, better
- TSMG 69K sh
- QCMU $17.51
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QCMU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | A70Higher |
| Mission | B67 | A79Higher |
| Risk | B63 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B60 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A73Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. QCMU and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QCMUC
TSMGA
In short
QCMU Qualcomm's daily move, doubled. Direxion packages 200% daily exposure to QCOM through swaps, with a matching bear fund for the other side of the trade. The leverage resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon tool by design.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
QCMU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of QUALCOMM Incorporated common shares before fees and expenses.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QCMU vs TSMG Holdings
How QCMU and TSMG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QCMU and 0.0% of TSMG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TSMG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QCMUMore in TSMG | QCMU | TSMG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- QCMU100.0%
- TSMG214.6%
- QCMU2
- TSMG1
Asset class
- QCMU
- Equity
- TSMG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in QCMU2
- In both0
- Only in TSMG1
Only in QCMU
2 securities, 24.0% of QCMU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 50615.16%
- Qualcomm Inc8.80%
Only in TSMG
1 security, 14.6% of TSMG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/204014.59%
Weight gaps
QCMU and TSMG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QCMU vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying QCMU vs TSMG
$5,159
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QCMU 1.07%
$19,815
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QCMU | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,881 | $1,353 | $528 |
| 20 | $7,046 | $5,142 | $1,904 |
| 30 | $19,815 | $14,656 | $5,159 |
- 1.07%QCMU
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
QCMU 213th cheapest of 315 funds
QCMU vs TSMG Dividends
- QCMU 3.52%
- TSMG
- QCMU $0.59
- TSMG
- QCMU $0.14
- TSMG $2.73
- QCMU Sep 22, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- QCMU Sep 29, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- QCMU Quarterly
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
QCMU vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QCMU 131.0%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- QCMU 0.30TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- QCMU −68.7%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QCMU 8.91TSMG 3.81
QCMU and TSMG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.07% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
